So it looks more and more as if this could really happen. As if the primaries for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination were not already going to be hilarious enough, chances continue to increase that they will include one-time Barbara Boxer chew toy Carly Fiorina. Get ready for
So let me get this straight. Carly is running on the breasts and vagina platform? It's as if to say, you guys need a woman to go up against Hillary and I kinda fit that description. However, being a good conservative she's only running for the number 2 position so that a man can be President, as God intended. It's amazing, these people never fail to fulfill stereotypes.
"Not only did she lose by double digits in 2010, she left the campaign with a significant amount of debt, some of which remains unretired more than four years later."
But she was a *CEO* - all praise unto them. She is therefore <strike>better</strike> richer than the rest of us. </strike></strike>
She does have the tits for it.
Which crowdsourcing venue can I use to donate to this awesomeness?
(Yes, sarcasm.)
Why does she need a communications director when she can outsource it to HP&#039;s call center?
<em>&ldquo;If Hillary Clinton&rsquo;s the nominee, Republicans need a woman front and center</em>
Miss Lindsey 2016!!!!
<i>&quot;I love being a woman. I like dressing up; I love buying shoes.&quot;</i> - actual Carly Fiorina quote
Yup, she seems about perfect as the token GOP female running mate. No word yet on her love of sammich making, though.
I love the smell of hubris in the morning.
Hey, if she wants to throw her golden parachute money at the politisphere and entertain us in the process, I say go for it!
Well, considering her executive experience consists of destroying Hewlett Packard, I suspect she&#039;s a shoe in for the GOP ticket.
Would it be quicker to list the Republicans who are <em>not</em> running?
So let me get this straight. Carly is running on the breasts and vagina platform? It&#039;s as if to say, you guys need a woman to go up against Hillary and I kinda fit that description. However, being a good conservative she&#039;s only running for the number 2 position so that a man can be President, as God intended. It&#039;s amazing, these people never fail to fulfill stereotypes.
It would be deeply irresponsible.
And she is such a responsible CEO:
&quot;Not only did she lose by double digits in 2010, she left the campaign with a significant amount of debt, some of which remains unretired more than four years later.&quot;
But she was a *CEO* - all praise unto them. She is therefore <strike>better</strike> richer than the rest of us. </strike></strike>