49 Comments

What hath gay Nate Silver and his gay numbers wrought? Math is so unmanly!

Expand full comment

Clearly you <i>should</i> start asking - if you want to exhibit the intellectual rigor of the Family Research Council. None of our affirmative answers to any question can be taken at face value. If we're not devoted enough to our chosen tribe to satisfy them, they'll ignore us.

Expand full comment

Also, toes.

Expand full comment

I do not like that.

Expand full comment

But maybe of declining efficiency. I mean, really, brainwashing that only washes 55% of the brains?

Expand full comment

Well, you could say that 96% of Americans think the Family Research Council should die in a fire, but that would be rude.

Expand full comment

What ho, you think Dame Peggington is so constrained by mortal ephemera that she attends Mass in the <i>morning</i>? Ah, what japery.

Expand full comment

I hope that the hope you express is rewarded in reality. But "advocate for the poor" and "blanket objection to contraception" make a Venn diagram of non-intersecting circles in my mind.

Expand full comment

Nevertheless, it moves.

Expand full comment

Now, I don't want to start a religious war, but MORE KATE UPTON!!!

Expand full comment

55% of 31% of 24% of the total pop. = 4% of the whole.

The people who Bill Donohue claims are "the majority" represent one-twenty-fifth (1/25) of the US population.

Expand full comment

Karl Rove is screaming that Ohio will go to the real Catholics

Expand full comment

BINGO. it's all about the money- same as it ever was

Expand full comment

it's that whole Muslin connection

Expand full comment

I'm willing to bet that there's nothing extraordinary about his member

I am NOT willing to confirm that fact though...

Expand full comment

Kind of like the way "straight" wingnutz act around gay porn.

Expand full comment