Pope Francis I and a whole bunch of cardinals and bishops are holding a great big conference on marriage and the family, and so, as complete strangers to how marriages actually work (if they can be said to work at all), the Church Elders heard from an actual Catholic married couple, who spoke frankly about the importance of the horizontal rumble in their marriage:
So, this is going to end up with some liberalization of the Church&#039;s attitude towards <strike>annulment</strike> divorce?
While, as a practical thing, that would be a tiny forward step, it has this small problem of running exactly contrary to one of the very few behavioral strictures about which Jesus* ever allegedly expressed a personal opinion.
It&#039;s been a while since I read the New Testament, but my recollection of the things where Jesus* allegedly said, explicitly, &quot;do this&quot; is: (1) let little children come to me; (2) turn the other cheek; (3) give away all your possessions and follow me; (4) don&#039;t do moneychanging <i>in the temple</i>; (5) don&#039;t get divorced, ever. [Notably, he* didn&rsquo;t have a word to say about the ghey, one way or the other]
There may be others -- I didn&#039;t go review the red print before writing this -- but my point is that (5) is leaned on pretty heavily by the big guy. If the Catlicks modify that, they&rsquo;re pretty much admitting that it&rsquo;s <b>all</b> subject to review. Which, of course, it always has been.
* The alleged person alleged to have been named Jesus. </b></b>
Maybe not, but the largest concentration of peep shows in Warsaw is located at..... wait for it.... John Paul II Avenue. Um, or at least that&#039;s what <a href="" target="_blank">they</a> tell me.
&quot; &#039;This cannot actually be a real thing,&#039; said one cardinal. &lsquo;This &lsquo;Cleveland Steamer&rsquo; &#039;?&quot;
Yeah, I have my doubts about that one too. The exceptionally large number of entries describing sex acts involving #2 are rather suspect.
Been there, done that. -- Tom&aacute;s de Torquemada
And why do only the right-wing fucknuts know about it?
What did you get altered?
These are the guys who just recently gave Galileo a get-out-of jail card . . . give them time.
<a href="https:\/\/twitter.com\/BuzzFeedNews\/status\/316567841912532992" target="_blank">Here&#039;s one.</a>
He&#039;s a prelate and he&#039;s okayâªâ«
ISWYDT
Sadly, I did that (look it up) some time back.
So, this is going to end up with some liberalization of the Church&#039;s attitude towards <strike>annulment</strike> divorce?
While, as a practical thing, that would be a tiny forward step, it has this small problem of running exactly contrary to one of the very few behavioral strictures about which Jesus* ever allegedly expressed a personal opinion.
It&#039;s been a while since I read the New Testament, but my recollection of the things where Jesus* allegedly said, explicitly, &quot;do this&quot; is: (1) let little children come to me; (2) turn the other cheek; (3) give away all your possessions and follow me; (4) don&#039;t do moneychanging <i>in the temple</i>; (5) don&#039;t get divorced, ever. [Notably, he* didn&rsquo;t have a word to say about the ghey, one way or the other]
There may be others -- I didn&#039;t go review the red print before writing this -- but my point is that (5) is leaned on pretty heavily by the big guy. If the Catlicks modify that, they&rsquo;re pretty much admitting that it&rsquo;s <b>all</b> subject to review. Which, of course, it always has been.
* The alleged person alleged to have been named Jesus. </b></b>
You <i>slut</i>.
Also, too, Leonard&#039;s twenty or so other verses.
Hahahaha. Abortion (which isn&#039;t mentioned ANYWHERE in the bibble) is clearly of the debbil.
The more things change, the more the assholes ignore it.
(My French is inadequate)
Maybe not, but the largest concentration of peep shows in Warsaw is located at..... wait for it.... John Paul II Avenue. Um, or at least that&#039;s what <a href="" target="_blank">they</a> tell me.
Google Image Search NOT RECOMMENDED
&quot; &#039;This cannot actually be a real thing,&#039; said one cardinal. &lsquo;This &lsquo;Cleveland Steamer&rsquo; &#039;?&quot;
Yeah, I have my doubts about that one too. The exceptionally large number of entries describing sex acts involving #2 are rather suspect.