19 Comments

Did either of the listeners to The Janet Mefferd Show call in with comments?

Expand full comment

No -- her parents both fell asleep...

Expand full comment

It's also on Hulu, but with ads.

Expand full comment

Newton ate a fig cookie.

Expand full comment

<i>“Boy, but when you have so many scientists who simply do not accept Darwinian evolution it seems to me that that might be something to throw in there, you know, the old, ‘some scientists say this, others disagree and think this,’ but that’s not even allowed.”</i>

To quote the great radio philosopher Joe Frank, "Equal time for both points of view: we've heard from the victim; now let's let the torturer have his say. Because both sides are equally valid."

Expand full comment

I was totally with Tyson until he dissed the grilled cheese sandwich.

You. Do. Not. Mess. with. the Cheese.

Expand full comment

No love for Leibniz?

Expand full comment

<i>criticize Cosmos for not providing airtime for Creationism adherents</i>

Much like "700 Club" provides air time for a discussion of science and evolution.

Expand full comment

I consider Creationists plausible in the sense that they seem to exist in the same manner I seem to exist.

Expand full comment

NdT really isn't particularly anti-religion - he's just pro-science. Seth McFarlane, on the other hand...

Expand full comment

I further demand that weather reports give equal time to "angels are bowling" every time there's thunderstorms.

Expand full comment

the Universal Sandbox is pretty damned cool. I may have to pony the $10 to unlock it.

Expand full comment

If these people want to fly without Science, let them do it the old-fashioned way: They can get their angel wings after Breitbarting off.

Expand full comment