12 Comments
User's avatar
BarackMyWorld's avatar

This would be good news for rational discourse, except <a href="http:\/\/www.intensedebate.com\/users\/1892169" target="_blank">partisan hacks are mostly impervious to facts and logic</a>.

Expand full comment
The Quirk's avatar

Lieberman is not a lizard, he's a basset hound.

Expand full comment
The Quirk's avatar

He's just as likely to start his own cult.

Expand full comment
SheriffRoscoe's avatar

LMAO

Expand full comment
SheriffRoscoe's avatar

Does he have any tattoos or body art? We could learn so much. Things like body piercings and tattoos of Chinese symbols or yin and yang or some other shit would indicate a left-leaning bent, whilst tattoos of swastikas and names of various women he's fucked during his lifetime would indicate a conservative. Also, no tattoos or body art at all would mean he's a conservative of the craziest kind.

I'm here to simply matters, wonketteers!

Expand full comment
PubOption's avatar

If the government was trying to control him through grammar, shouldn't he have shot an English teacher?

Expand full comment
Rarian Rakista's avatar

This guy will never be part of general population.

Expand full comment
Monsieur_Grumpe's avatar

It all makes sense now! Well, no, not really.

Expand full comment
Dashboard Buddha's avatar

Who knew independent meant disconnected?

Expand full comment
Mahousu's avatar

Right-wingers don't even pretend to use logic. Loughner wrote in (insane) syllogisms. Therefore, Loughner is a Marxist.

Loughner wants to return to the gold standard (so far as I can figure out). William Jennings Bryan apparently liked gold so much, he wanted to make a cross out of it. Therefore, Loughner is a Democrat. Plus a Muslim.

Expand full comment
PsycWench's avatar

As a college teacher I'm registering as in-depedantic.

Expand full comment
Dashboard Buddha's avatar

My town has a nutty guy wandering around damning large trucks to hell and he has eyes like that. Should I be afraid?

Expand full comment