12 Comments
User's avatar
BarackMyWorld's avatar

This would be good news for rational discourse, except <a href="http:\/\/www.intensedebate.com\/users\/1892169" target="_blank">partisan hacks are mostly impervious to facts and logic</a>.

The Quirk's avatar

Lieberman is not a lizard, he's a basset hound.

The Quirk's avatar

He's just as likely to start his own cult.

SheriffRoscoe's avatar

Does he have any tattoos or body art? We could learn so much. Things like body piercings and tattoos of Chinese symbols or yin and yang or some other shit would indicate a left-leaning bent, whilst tattoos of swastikas and names of various women he's fucked during his lifetime would indicate a conservative. Also, no tattoos or body art at all would mean he's a conservative of the craziest kind.

I'm here to simply matters, wonketteers!

PubOption's avatar

If the government was trying to control him through grammar, shouldn't he have shot an English teacher?

Rarian Rakista's avatar

This guy will never be part of general population.

Monsieur_Grumpe's avatar

It all makes sense now! Well, no, not really.

Dashboard Buddha's avatar

Who knew independent meant disconnected?

Mahousu's avatar

Right-wingers don't even pretend to use logic. Loughner wrote in (insane) syllogisms. Therefore, Loughner is a Marxist.

Loughner wants to return to the gold standard (so far as I can figure out). William Jennings Bryan apparently liked gold so much, he wanted to make a cross out of it. Therefore, Loughner is a Democrat. Plus a Muslim.

PsycWench's avatar

As a college teacher I'm registering as in-depedantic.

Dashboard Buddha's avatar

My town has a nutty guy wandering around damning large trucks to hell and he has eyes like that. Should I be afraid?