If you're a top-flight columnist, you get some perks in addition to a flattering photo next to your byline, like interns and assistants and stuff, people who can take care of the boring details that might get in the way of your creative genius. Or if you're David Brooks, they take care of the boring details that get in the way of writing whatever blandly conservative-tinged both-sides-need-to-be-reasonable twaddle you're slopping together today. And thanks to an
I can't say I ever found David Brooks writing to be "phsycologically damaging". Mindnumbingly tedious, narcissitic and whiny however...
Our new polite, well bred society frowns upon going up to folks and calling them "talentless twatwaffles" in public. Even if Bobo is a talentless twatwaffle, and many people say this under their breathe in his presence, it's just not worth the effort.
<i>Go fuck yourself David Brooks!</i> &quot;This one suggests you try yoga.&quot;
<i>U GAY, BROOKS</i> &quot;This person praises you on your happy demeanor.&quot;
<i>Keep sucking all that Koch Dick, you shameless pandering excuse of a whore</i> &quot;Karl Rove appears to be a little jealous of all your success, David.&quot;
&quot;Thirty-three &#039;fuck yous,&#039; twenty-one &#039;eat shits&#039; and seven &#039;you sucks&#039; and only one offer for oral copulation -- from Katherine Jean Lopez again. Are you thinking what I&#039;m thinking, sir?&quot;
&quot;I think I lost her number.&quot;
&quot;No, sir, I meant, I think people really enjoyed this column! That&#039;s way down from last week!&quot;
<em>&ldquo;I used to read them, but it was just too psychologically damaging,&rdquo; Brooks said of the comments. &ldquo;So then I would ask my assistant to read them.&rdquo;</em>
Isn&#039;t the fact that they are your assistant enough psychological torture, Mr. Brooks? Why punish them more?
Well, to be fair, NO ONE should read the comments section of anything, anywhere, online. It&#039;s much better for one&#039;s sanity. Thank goodness Wonkette doesn&#039;t allow such things!
Hey! What&#039;s the difference between two good ol&#039; boys who ride their Dodge Charger all over rural Georgia, evading the long arm of the Boss man, and a lazy douche egg who can&#039;t be bothered to participate in the exchange of ideas provoked by his own insipid, stupid column?
One of them is the Brave Dukes and the other one is.....
You don&#039;t suck!
If I read comments, I would thank you.
Remind me again. Which one is David Brooks and which one is George Will?
I can&#039;t say I ever found David Brooks writing to be &quot;phsycologically damaging&quot;. Mindnumbingly tedious, narcissitic and whiny however...
Our new polite, well bred society frowns upon going up to folks and calling them &quot;talentless twatwaffles&quot; in public. Even if Bobo is a talentless twatwaffle, and many people say this under their breathe in his presence, it&#039;s just not worth the effort.
Yeah, Brooks is more of a boil.
<i>Go fuck yourself David Brooks!</i> &quot;This one suggests you try yoga.&quot;
<i>U GAY, BROOKS</i> &quot;This person praises you on your happy demeanor.&quot;
<i>Keep sucking all that Koch Dick, you shameless pandering excuse of a whore</i> &quot;Karl Rove appears to be a little jealous of all your success, David.&quot;
&quot;Thirty-three &#039;fuck yous,&#039; twenty-one &#039;eat shits&#039; and seven &#039;you sucks&#039; and only one offer for oral copulation -- from Katherine Jean Lopez again. Are you thinking what I&#039;m thinking, sir?&quot;
&quot;I think I lost her number.&quot;
&quot;No, sir, I meant, I think people really enjoyed this column! That&#039;s way down from last week!&quot;
Will is the one who thinks he has a baseball obsession.
<i>I used to read them, but it was just too psychologically damaging,</i>
Amazing. The same thing can be said about any of your columns, David.
<i>I think in my whole life I&#039;ve had two people come up and be nasty to me,</i>
Are you getting enough air inside that bubble?
Man, if only Wonkette allowed comments...
<em>&ldquo;I used to read them, but it was just too psychologically damaging,&rdquo; Brooks said of the comments. &ldquo;So then I would ask my assistant to read them.&rdquo;</em>
Isn&#039;t the fact that they are your assistant enough psychological torture, Mr. Brooks? Why punish them more?
People online are mean???
*clutches pearls*
Well, to be fair, NO ONE should read the comments section of anything, anywhere, online. It&#039;s much better for one&#039;s sanity. Thank goodness Wonkette doesn&#039;t allow such things!
Hey! What&#039;s the difference between two good ol&#039; boys who ride their Dodge Charger all over rural Georgia, evading the long arm of the Boss man, and a lazy douche egg who can&#039;t be bothered to participate in the exchange of ideas provoked by his own insipid, stupid column?
One of them is the Brave Dukes and the other one is.....