Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dylan Black's avatar

Well yes, if you're saying the Saturn V should have been preserved and possibly even favored as a heavy lift system over the shuttle program, I wholeheartedly agree with that. The problem then is the same as the problem now: it is difficult to get the funding levels necessary. That is why the SLS exists, the comparison chart I posted shows how the SLS is going to cost a pittance in inflation adjusted dollars per launch compared to the saturn V. Its also NOT really including a ton of the sunk costs, as the author of the chart notes the figures on pre-NASA spending on the rocket systems that led to Saturn I and ultimately saturn V are lacking for obvious reasons.

Yes, if Robert Kennedy had become president and decided to keep funding Saturn V, we'd probably have a permanent moonbase already. I've just already mourned and moved on from that beautiful dream, its not coming back anytime soon.

Expand full comment
Jared James's avatar

The more you mock[tm]

Expand full comment
37 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?