Evidently that's Quevin McC.'s goal for Dems: "They should not participate in government at all"!! is a quote (?) Himself read to me from some online article or other. Careful there, Qev.....:)
I used to live on Maui, which has plenty of water, all in the wrong places. Even there the issue of rich fools wanting to build without a permanent source of water was a perennial headache. Like nitwits who build houses on sand and then get swept away by hurricanes, I say, I feel your pain but I am sure as hell not planning to share it.
You'll notice the brief mention of a really big deal. Saudi companies buy "farm land" then drill deep into an aquifer, irrigate alfalfa, ship the alfalfa to the KSA. AND it's legal. Incredibly unethical and devastating to the aquifer. Remind me again which family is all up in the KSA money?
Maybe. But to me poll workers are the unsung heroes of defeating the Big Lie, and I always hope for recounts that (almost without exception, historically) confirm the integrity of their approach to the e work. So 511 would be fine but in my book 510 would be perfection. Allegations against poll workers are beneath contempt.
So why would people who voted against Kari Lake, whose loss was in the thousands, not give a matched equal win to Mayes?
Because people who fancy themselves "independents" (more Righties there but some dumb fucking Lefties too) think that they are showing great virtue when they say "I don't want one party to have all the power".
Maybe back in the Before Times when...at least so I hear from from the punditry...D's and R's worked together to craft moderate solutions that sort of glib blarpery had a basis. Now, though, they were just saying, "Let's have a governor who thinks that elections matter and women are people but a chief LEO who will try to undermine both".
Seriously - the sanctimonious crap about "divided government" has to be slapped out of these people.
This is the kind of students they were: "In the end, when we ask the question "What is Huckleberry Finn about" we must ask another question, what does it mean to each individual reader TIME
We don't hear much about chemtrails any more.
Evidently that's Quevin McC.'s goal for Dems: "They should not participate in government at all"!! is a quote (?) Himself read to me from some online article or other. Careful there, Qev.....:)
See yourself out...
Or any other Christofascist Fundagelical Asshole. /Grrr\FFS
I used to live on Maui, which has plenty of water, all in the wrong places. Even there the issue of rich fools wanting to build without a permanent source of water was a perennial headache. Like nitwits who build houses on sand and then get swept away by hurricanes, I say, I feel your pain but I am sure as hell not planning to share it.
You'll notice the brief mention of a really big deal. Saudi companies buy "farm land" then drill deep into an aquifer, irrigate alfalfa, ship the alfalfa to the KSA. AND it's legal. Incredibly unethical and devastating to the aquifer. Remind me again which family is all up in the KSA money?
God bless US poll workers. Here's to a recount result of exactly 510.
"I got mine, fuck you." is a plank in the republican party platform.
511 would be better.
Maybe. But to me poll workers are the unsung heroes of defeating the Big Lie, and I always hope for recounts that (almost without exception, historically) confirm the integrity of their approach to the e work. So 511 would be fine but in my book 510 would be perfection. Allegations against poll workers are beneath contempt.
Q came along and had much better conspiracies.
Hamadeh should be ashamed to be a Rethug coming from Syria...or did he think Assad is someone to be emulated?
Arizona always starts sounding better around this time of year when ya live in the North.
So why would people who voted against Kari Lake, whose loss was in the thousands, not give a matched equal win to Mayes?
Because people who fancy themselves "independents" (more Righties there but some dumb fucking Lefties too) think that they are showing great virtue when they say "I don't want one party to have all the power".
Maybe back in the Before Times when...at least so I hear from from the punditry...D's and R's worked together to craft moderate solutions that sort of glib blarpery had a basis. Now, though, they were just saying, "Let's have a governor who thinks that elections matter and women are people but a chief LEO who will try to undermine both".
Seriously - the sanctimonious crap about "divided government" has to be slapped out of these people.
This is the kind of students they were: "In the end, when we ask the question "What is Huckleberry Finn about" we must ask another question, what does it mean to each individual reader TIME
Or they'll go the Nick Fuentes route: "This country is irredeemably corrupt, so we need a fascist dictatorship!"