As opposed to the International Anarcho-Syndicalist Casa del Obrero Mundial that was here in Mexico City back in the 1910s (with a lovely Orozco mural)?
"This could be an option, but it would be a pretty sad one. It would hurt poor people in red states that don't have anything to do with any of this. That is why we don't just cut off states that don't do what we want when we are in charge."
This is true but unfortunately they may end up being causalities of war since the red states are using them as human shields. We may not have a choice anymore since we're running out of non-violent option to get the message across. Hitting people in the wallet tends to get the point across and it's better then actual fighting. War is hell, Robyn - we may have to accept we cannot protect them if they're outside blue state borders. We welcome them, we offer relocation services and run an underground railroad if we have to but we can't take a decent option off the table because not everyone in red states is a Cult45er.
At first I read that as "Antichrist jurisdictions" and now I has a dissapoint
People before property
Yeah, we can't have a city run by consensus, rather than coercion, now can we?
The US dictionary definition has very little to do with the political philosophy of governance by consensus not coercion Hell, Quakers are anarchists.
As opposed to the International Anarcho-Syndicalist Casa del Obrero Mundial that was here in Mexico City back in the 1910s (with a lovely Orozco mural)?
https://twitter.com/ElieNYC...
https://twitter.com/ElieNYC...
Literally nobody should be listening to what an organization whose titular head continues to be Bill Barr has to say
https://twitter.com/ElieNYC...
SPLITTER!
My branch is a mere four blocks from home. Thanks to everyone who works in a library, anywhere. You're all heroes to me.
Union Square Greenmarket isn't open Sunday. Saturday, Wednesday, and Friday.
I just got in. Wear your mask.
You're never at the meetings!
He graduated from George Washington Law School.
I doubt that "Anarchist Jurisdiction 101" was in the curriculum but there ya go.
Yeah, I know. I wasn't about to dox myself...
Federal purse strings are held by the House of Representatives, not the Senate. Mitch is even more helpless here than the Pumpkin Traitor is.
"This could be an option, but it would be a pretty sad one. It would hurt poor people in red states that don't have anything to do with any of this. That is why we don't just cut off states that don't do what we want when we are in charge."
This is true but unfortunately they may end up being causalities of war since the red states are using them as human shields. We may not have a choice anymore since we're running out of non-violent option to get the message across. Hitting people in the wallet tends to get the point across and it's better then actual fighting. War is hell, Robyn - we may have to accept we cannot protect them if they're outside blue state borders. We welcome them, we offer relocation services and run an underground railroad if we have to but we can't take a decent option off the table because not everyone in red states is a Cult45er.