I can’t take credit for the idea, I read it somewhere, but how about Democrats have ACTUAL LAWYERS question McGahn, junior, Hicks, et al., as was done at the Watergate hearings? It really helps depersonalize it, makes it more about the facts than the drama, more like a court where serious shit is going on and less like a shit show.
Going way back to Watergate, the Select Committee's head lawyers questioned the witnesses at the televised hearing before the politicians did. this set a professional tone.
Going way back to Watergate, the Select Committee's head lawyers questioned the witnesses at the televised hearing before the politicians did. this set a professional tone.
I can’t take credit for the idea, I read it somewhere, but how about Democrats have ACTUAL LAWYERS question McGahn, junior, Hicks, et al., as was done at the Watergate hearings? It really helps depersonalize it, makes it more about the facts than the drama, more like a court where serious shit is going on and less like a shit show.
Fucker gonna sing like a bird.
It's said that sequels aren't equals, but I can't wait to see 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, even without Henry Fonda.
I can’t take credit for the idea, I read it somewhere, but how about Democrats have ACTUAL LAWYERS question McGahn, junior, Hicks, et al., as was done at the Watergate hearings? It really helps depersonalize it, makes it more about the facts than the drama, more like a court where serious shit is going on and less like a shit show.
"This was an illegally started hoax..." Jesus wept. His linguistic chops match his emotional age.
Going way back to Watergate, the Select Committee's head lawyers questioned the witnesses at the televised hearing before the politicians did. this set a professional tone.
Please correct me, but can't Trump invoke executive privilege on all, if not most, of Mr McGahn's testimony?
I was under the impression that executive privilege allowed, not compelled a witness to refuse to testify.
I was under the impression that executive privilege allowed, not compelled a witness to refuse to testify.
Please correct me, but can't Trump invoke executive privilege on all, if not most, of Mr McGahn's testimony?
Going way back to Watergate, the Select Committee's head lawyers questioned the witnesses at the televised hearing before the politicians did. this set a professional tone.
"This was an illegally started hoax..." Jesus wept. His linguistic chops match his emotional age.
I can’t take credit for the idea, I read it somewhere, but how about Democrats have ACTUAL LAWYERS question McGahn, junior, Hicks, et al., as was done at the Watergate hearings? It really helps depersonalize it, makes it more about the facts than the drama, more like a court where serious shit is going on and less like a shit show.
It's said that sequels aren't equals, but I can't wait to see 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, even without Henry Fonda.
Fucker gonna sing like a bird.