No, cupcake... the reason Trumplestilskin can get so much traction for his misogynistic, racist mouthwaffle is because the dimmest of the dim of our electorate think that clearly enunciating what other misogynistic, racist assholes only hint at makes him "honest."
It's not the fault of the people who write about it... it's the fault of the party whose relentless use of dog whistles and code words reinforced, rather than fixed, the nasty, insular, bigoted stupidity of their dimmest voters, who laid the groundwork for him.
You are not going to be featured in DSFB this week with that weak effort. Might I suggest either all-caps or random capitalized characters sprinkled throughout your comment? Next, please work on your spelling. Not a single fucking misspelled word does not a DSFB make. Live a little -- turn "people" into "poEple." Swap in a q for your g. Maybe even add a homophone or two. Which brings me to the next phase of the perfect DSFB submission: throw in a homophobic slur or two, or at least denigrate women. Maybe refer to us all as pansy libtards. Put in the fucking effort, man! And finally, tie it all together with something about guns and god. Show us you really care. There is plenty more you could do, but this should help you get the basics down. So tying it all together, instead of a sad "You people are filthy. First and last visit. Disgusting!" give us a solid comment like "You c0mmIe LIBTURd treehugging faggots r diqsustinG! flthiy lying libs, gonna grba mah gunz YOU COAWRDLY COCKSUCKERS WODNT KNOW A FACT IF IT FKUCED YOU IN TEH EYE!!!!!!!!!111!! I hope you all die in a toilet fire and god throws you in hell you sick analers. Your not funny and I'm never coming back because i bet you wont even print this." Now THAT is a comment that could get you at least a fourth-place finish in DSFB. As it is now, I can't decide whether you are doing a fairly accurate impersonation of Trump, or are serious. Please come back and try again.
Sometimes I really am glad that Wonkette does not allow comments, because some of these (the "I would bang her" ones) are really gross. Like, is it really helpful to respond to this article (about a misogynistic meathead who objectifies women) by objectifying women even more ?
hey i think the Meg is fuckable if she would keep her mouth shut - but then what good would she be -
You take that back!!! We are NOT filthy!! We are vile and nasty and a snark mob but WE ARE NOT FILTHY!!!
Seriously, dude, who gives a fuck what some Trumplicker thinks?
Google calls it a vile little snark mob.Didn't you google this pit of vipers first?Oh and buh-by....
No, cupcake... the reason Trumplestilskin can get so much traction for his misogynistic, racist mouthwaffle is because the dimmest of the dim of our electorate think that clearly enunciating what other misogynistic, racist assholes only hint at makes him "honest."
It's not the fault of the people who write about it... it's the fault of the party whose relentless use of dog whistles and code words reinforced, rather than fixed, the nasty, insular, bigoted stupidity of their dimmest voters, who laid the groundwork for him.
He'll bring dignity back to the White House.
That was funny....my last shred of hope for humanity died but it was funny
The offspring agrees with you. He used to watch Celebrity Apprentice regularly just on the off-chance that he'd get to see Ivanka.
You are not going to be featured in DSFB this week with that weak effort. Might I suggest either all-caps or random capitalized characters sprinkled throughout your comment? Next, please work on your spelling. Not a single fucking misspelled word does not a DSFB make. Live a little -- turn "people" into "poEple." Swap in a q for your g. Maybe even add a homophone or two. Which brings me to the next phase of the perfect DSFB submission: throw in a homophobic slur or two, or at least denigrate women. Maybe refer to us all as pansy libtards. Put in the fucking effort, man! And finally, tie it all together with something about guns and god. Show us you really care. There is plenty more you could do, but this should help you get the basics down. So tying it all together, instead of a sad "You people are filthy. First and last visit. Disgusting!" give us a solid comment like "You c0mmIe LIBTURd treehugging faggots r diqsustinG! flthiy lying libs, gonna grba mah gunz YOU COAWRDLY COCKSUCKERS WODNT KNOW A FACT IF IT FKUCED YOU IN TEH EYE!!!!!!!!!111!! I hope you all die in a toilet fire and god throws you in hell you sick analers. Your not funny and I'm never coming back because i bet you wont even print this." Now THAT is a comment that could get you at least a fourth-place finish in DSFB. As it is now, I can't decide whether you are doing a fairly accurate impersonation of Trump, or are serious. Please come back and try again.
Do you understand sarcasm?
If you do, please apply to my earlier comment.
You're one to judge given that your whole username sounds like a reference to your dick.
Low standards, you say?
*scooches up*
That Icelandic lore is racier than I thought, I guess.
The shocking realization about what Peter Gabriel is really singing about in "Sledgehammer" ruined me.
I felt that way about Nigel Tufnel's "Lick My Love Pump"
Agree. Trump is merely the crystallization of the gop playbook.
Sometimes I really am glad that Wonkette does not allow comments, because some of these (the "I would bang her" ones) are really gross. Like, is it really helpful to respond to this article (about a misogynistic meathead who objectifies women) by objectifying women even more ?