382 Comments

If there is indeed a new, more cautious Trump, he'll probably be about as stable and lasting as the other one and disappear the very next time someone says something he doesn't like.

Expand full comment

FedEx gives me 50¢ letters, I'll consider switching....

Expand full comment

I find it amazing that they have managed to turn Nancy Pelosi into the Devil for being able to lead her party, while Paul Ryan, just like his drunken predecessor, has never found a way to get the tea baggers off his forehead. There is a ballsack shaped print on Ryan’s forehead from the Freedumb Cockass, and he knows it’s why they can’t pass a fucking bill worth talking about.

Expand full comment

They used to be everywhere in my hometown. We ate them like Halloween candy.

Expand full comment

Yeah, doesn't pass the sniff test.

Expand full comment

What exactly are we supposed to do? We can't all be psychotic morons!

Expand full comment

Yeah, but pardoning the Grimace was the last straw!

http://businessboost.xyz/wp...

That guy should be in prison!

Expand full comment

Edward Everett Horton libelz!

Expand full comment

Since he wants to defund PBS because Sesame Street made fun of him -

Desire Under the Elmos

(apologies, I have limited material to work with.)

Expand full comment

Where’s the profit in that?

Expand full comment

Why not? It works for us! GOP Base Voters

Expand full comment

Did you get better?

Expand full comment

When you think of what people consumed every day 150 years ago, (kids drank beer because water had cholera and milk had TB), you would stop worrying about unwashed grapes. Stomach has hydrochloric acid for a reason

Expand full comment

Wrong

Jack said that:

1. Guns have legitimate uses as hunting tools 2. Only military personnel should have military weapons

Tell ya what, you wanna launch a 1- man invasion of North Korea with a musket , do me a solid and Go Pro that, I will watch and cheer for ya

You sleep soundly only because rough men and women stand watch in the night

Expand full comment

Slightly over the top reaction Rooster.I'm anti-war and would be a conscientious objector at best because in my lifetime I've seen only 'wars' that are for corporate profits and haven't had any real basis for protecting either side that couldn't have been worked out by not having war. I totally agree with the hunting purposes and the military should only possess military equipment thing.I just have a hard time with slaughtering other people in the name of war, or having our own slaughtered all the same. Battalions or whatever of ground soldiers is a thing of the past.

Tell you what, you wanna fight North Korea with a machine gun, have at it and I'll send flowers to somebody's family that shouldn't have died/been cut to pieces uselessly.

I'm fairly sure you know that I didn't mean what you're saying but you went all extra hyperbole and patriotic to make a straw man point for some reason?I sleep well and always have, if I don't, its because I worry that some gun ho leader will start a war just to prove he has a bigger dick or is a bigger dick??

Expand full comment

No, it's that you took Jack's comments out of context. I've been fighting people with and without weapons for most of my life, and I hope to never fight anyone again from this day forward. Make love, not war, if you have any choice in the matter. However, there is evil in the world, and weapons parity makes it hard for evil to triumph. I admire both soldiers who put their lives on the line as well as CO's who make a moral stand against death equally. We need both to make society work. I don't want to invade any country with any weapons anytime, except maybe one of the Star Trek planets with the hot green babes. And that one only with a friendly weapon, if you know what I mean.

As' Salam 'a Leiukum

Expand full comment