There's just nobody as horrible as Trump. There's no other person in the world, and I say not even elementary school children, who'd speak this way of an enemy-- and he ALWAYS does: "warmonger Liz Cheney, WHO HAS VIRTUALLY NO SUPPORT LEFT IN WYOMING."
Is there anyone else this pitiful on the planet? He has to claim so-and-so crawled to him for a job but he refused, or "sure I took her furniture shopping" and "are you kidding? she's not my type."
I try to think along economic or population lines - Rhode Island at least has a million people! More than you can say for North and South Dakota (which will henceforth just be Dakota). But West Virginia didn't even have a reason to exist when it was simply part of Virginia: Cut off from the rest by mountains and without a single metropolitan center to rely on. Hence: Ohio!
Now, you see how this Facebook "Oversight Board" is bullshit? True, Trump's "indefinite suspension" is not an actual defined policy. It was, however, completely proper under the circumstances. It is arguable that there is a special public interest in a political leader's statements that argues against a perma-ban, yet the public danger was clear. Therefore the correct action is to suspend until the danger passes.
The Oversight Board, so we were told, was created in part to clarify policies regarding accounts belonging to political leaders. A proper exercise of their alleged mandate would have included a recommendation to create an "indefinite suspension" policy for these situations.
Blablablablah.
Very carefully!
There's just nobody as horrible as Trump. There's no other person in the world, and I say not even elementary school children, who'd speak this way of an enemy-- and he ALWAYS does: "warmonger Liz Cheney, WHO HAS VIRTUALLY NO SUPPORT LEFT IN WYOMING."
Is there anyone else this pitiful on the planet? He has to claim so-and-so crawled to him for a job but he refused, or "sure I took her furniture shopping" and "are you kidding? she's not my type."
I guess we're used to it but, Godalmighty.
The Forbidden Stuff is apparently only forbidden to users, not the site owner!
Yeah, and what about Rhode Island? You could drop that entire state in Brewster County, Texas, and then lose track of it.
I like the part where it says commenters cannot call for "breaking the law."
1. Most of the commenters already have2. So has the commentee3. And that's what he's doing now.
I try to think along economic or population lines - Rhode Island at least has a million people! More than you can say for North and South Dakota (which will henceforth just be Dakota). But West Virginia didn't even have a reason to exist when it was simply part of Virginia: Cut off from the rest by mountains and without a single metropolitan center to rely on. Hence: Ohio!
Wow. I never thought I'd get to watch a senile racist publically break down in real time.
https://www.newyorker.com/h...
Can we have more of those types of restaurants instead of these "all-organic, non-GMO ingredients!" ones? D;
Trump took a stand against violating international law, WTF?
A Statement by Flashman, Wonkette Commenter Number 65,373, Noble Prize Nominee and Awardee of Four Whore Diamonds:
(Working on my future comment template)
Only in the speech.
Now, you see how this Facebook "Oversight Board" is bullshit? True, Trump's "indefinite suspension" is not an actual defined policy. It was, however, completely proper under the circumstances. It is arguable that there is a special public interest in a political leader's statements that argues against a perma-ban, yet the public danger was clear. Therefore the correct action is to suspend until the danger passes.
The Oversight Board, so we were told, was created in part to clarify policies regarding accounts belonging to political leaders. A proper exercise of their alleged mandate would have included a recommendation to create an "indefinite suspension" policy for these situations.
Trump will kick Zuckerberg off of his site, so there!
i can't believe this shit was our world for five years.
god.