Little Photoshop of Horrors If you've haunted the Interwebs regularly, you've probably already seen Los Angeles artist Illma Gore's now-infamous painting of a nude Donald Trump as a would-be emperor (and a less than impressively endowed one, at that) with no clothes on at all. The image went viral not long after Gore posted her portrait of the short-dingered vulgarian to Twitter in February. You may have already been traumatized by happening upon the painting in a comments section near you, but for the purposes of not getting in Dutch with the Google Gods, we've bowdlerized the image by putting Donald in a tasteful pair of Wonkette vagina dentata panties, available, sans Trump,
I read about the Digital Millennial Copyright Act and it made no sense to me at all. That said, I don't see how an artist painting a picture like this and selling it violates this act. Anybody out there able to clarify? Thanks!
He's having a prosthetic prop penis built for the production.It'll be the greatest prosthetic prop penis ever, let me tell you...It's gonna be YUGE!And he's gonna make Mexico pay for it!
This artist did a whole series of Hillary Clinton paintings a few years back. Some people found them distasteful. But I honestly believe the artist treated Ms. Clinton with love!
Not so much love for drumpf though. Which indicates that this is a GREAT artist.
After seeing the segment about Kasich's condescension on Rachel Maddow, I finally went to Wikipedia to see how old he is. The fucker's two years older than me, and he still calls female college students coeds? I call them women.
I feel for Ms. Gore, I really do. I reported a neighbor to the police for having an illegal rooster in his back yard, and he got a summons for peace disturbance, and he refuses to get rid of the rooster, and says if he loses the case in court he will sue me to recover his costs. Just as in Ms. Gore's case, he doesn't have the legal right to do that, but not having the legal right to do something has never stopped a moron before. Perhaps Ms. Gore could send me her painting, and I could send her the rooster??? That would confuse everyone.
She made his hands way too big.
I read about the Digital Millennial Copyright Act and it made no sense to me at all. That said, I don't see how an artist painting a picture like this and selling it violates this act. Anybody out there able to clarify? Thanks!
He's having a prosthetic prop penis built for the production.It'll be the greatest prosthetic prop penis ever, let me tell you...It's gonna be YUGE!And he's gonna make Mexico pay for it!
Nor does the name Jan Pieter Zenger, more's the pity.
Has that little Spanish lady been touching up paintings again?
This reminds me of "Beast Jesus" for some reason.
This artist did a whole series of Hillary Clinton paintings a few years back. Some people found them distasteful. But I honestly believe the artist treated Ms. Clinton with love!
Not so much love for drumpf though. Which indicates that this is a GREAT artist.
10 thumbs up!
Someone is actually willing to pay $141,000 to hang that on their wall?
After seeing the segment about Kasich's condescension on Rachel Maddow, I finally went to Wikipedia to see how old he is. The fucker's two years older than me, and he still calls female college students coeds? I call them women.
he's dudly do wrong. i really think the painting captures the real trump. whether anatomically correct, doesn't matter.
seemingly nobody outside of John Oliver lets him get away with it!
Nobody lets him get away with it? Surely you mean the opposite? No one is willing to call him out on it. Journamalisticism is dead.
Hopefully, it's to take it out into a yard and shoot it.
Wait. This is London. They're going to take it out into the yard and try to make it apologize. Then they'll probably shoot it.
I guess the pundits were right after all, and Trump can't win the erection process
But as the portrait demonstrates...well let's just say there is unlikely to be a problem with "hanging chads" here.
3) Cruz with a dildo shaped like Donald Trump...
I feel for Ms. Gore, I really do. I reported a neighbor to the police for having an illegal rooster in his back yard, and he got a summons for peace disturbance, and he refuses to get rid of the rooster, and says if he loses the case in court he will sue me to recover his costs. Just as in Ms. Gore's case, he doesn't have the legal right to do that, but not having the legal right to do something has never stopped a moron before. Perhaps Ms. Gore could send me her painting, and I could send her the rooster??? That would confuse everyone.
If you're having cocktail weenies, it shouldn't bother you that much.