It is TOTALLY UNFAIR to ban Nazis from social media for their right wing views, because people don't get banned from Facebook for extreme left wing views like (checks notes) support for universal basic income, universal healthcare, and not destroying the planet we live on. Unless you espouse these views accompanied by a photo of a woman breast-feeding an infant, because that's super offensive. /s
OK, let's say I had an old fashioned news paper. I printed stuff about, and said by, a particular person. Later, could that person sue because I ceased? Just trying to understand the logic here. Can Comrade Trumpski force me to print his inane ramblings? For freedom?
Looking forward to depo. Assuming that, when this gets dismissed because it was filed in the wrong venue and finally gets refiled properly—in California, like it must be—there is actually a legal procedure that takes place before some judge dismisses the whole mess with prejudice.
Almost as likely, given the tradition of fundraising in the rightwing grift farm, is you automatically signed up to make repeating donations at least five times.
/\ This. ALL OF IT.He just keeps doing this shit, with some reall chameen lawyers too, sounds like.
One wonders if the whole goal isn't just "LOOK AT MEEE!!" Oh, and for the Rethugs (including RNC) to be able to join the cause so as to grift of it, natch.
~sigh~ Time to join you in that *redacted*. Skoal!
He is grifting. The lawsuits are nuisances, and he should have long ago been censored for his 4,000 ridiculous lawsuits.
It is TOTALLY UNFAIR to ban Nazis from social media for their right wing views, because people don't get banned from Facebook for extreme left wing views like (checks notes) support for universal basic income, universal healthcare, and not destroying the planet we live on. Unless you espouse these views accompanied by a photo of a woman breast-feeding an infant, because that's super offensive. /s
Florida lawyers also tend to be super busy with shady real estate deals.
If not for shady real estate deals and cocaine, the economy of Florida would collapse.
TFG's name only grows with his "reputation!" HFBHVFF, I mean to say!
OK, let's say I had an old fashioned news paper. I printed stuff about, and said by, a particular person. Later, could that person sue because I ceased? Just trying to understand the logic here. Can Comrade Trumpski force me to print his inane ramblings? For freedom?
Looking forward to depo. Assuming that, when this gets dismissed because it was filed in the wrong venue and finally gets refiled properly—in California, like it must be—there is actually a legal procedure that takes place before some judge dismisses the whole mess with prejudice.
Discovery would be fun, though.
https://media4.giphy.com/me...
We almost wish the courts would ignore due process, just this once.
Catch-22: that would make the coke fiend's collection of anti-Semitic losers the government, so Trump would have to sue them.
Almost as likely, given the tradition of fundraising in the rightwing grift farm, is you automatically signed up to make repeating donations at least five times.
Yes, people really are that dumb. Ta, Jamie Lynn.
His only hope is to have judges he put onto the courts, since many of them were unqualified.
She looks good. You don’t want her to put on weight too quickly. That would just be fat. Muscle takes longer.
I dare them to be able to prove shadow banning even exists outside their own faecal ridden brains, let alone win any of the other stoopid arguments.
/\ This. ALL OF IT.He just keeps doing this shit, with some reall chameen lawyers too, sounds like.
One wonders if the whole goal isn't just "LOOK AT MEEE!!" Oh, and for the Rethugs (including RNC) to be able to join the cause so as to grift of it, natch.
~sigh~ Time to join you in that *redacted*. Skoal!