Now it’s making some sense why Elon Musk is so weird and has such terrible views. And using the social media platform you destroyed to encourage voter fraud is just so conservative.
Jaysus, that slasher smile of hers is gonna give me nightmares.
ETA: Also, I should say that I liked the number of fellow travelers who responded to her with some variation on "Hey, I know you're just joking, but you should consider that some people will take you seriously and report this."
Haha, she wasn't joking. I know, because jokes are supposed to be funny, and I defy anyone to explain how this was "funny."
It's a good thing there are no musks involved with anything that involves math or logic... I've parsed it every way I can, and it's either ten votes, or one thousand.
10 names = 10 votes. Do each of those 10 votes at 10 polling stations. 10 votes x 10 polling stations = 100 votes.
Yes, it's still batshit insane and wildly illegal, but it does equal 100 votes. That'll get thrown out, assuming they don't notice that they've already seen you at twice under a different name, but it's 100 votes.
(Also, too -- I guess you would need to do this in a state with same-day registration? Because unless you're stealing the names of 10 registered voters, you're not going to be able to just waltz up to the poll worker and say, "I'm I. P. Freely, and I'm here to get my ballot" unless you can register there. In which case you'll also need fake IDs that will satisfy whatever requirements are in place. Really, it's pretty obvious she did not think this plan out very well.)
You need the fake names to vote multiple times in the same polling booth, they're one claim, so that part pans out, but why would you not vote using your real name as well? So the result should be either 101 or 110 votes, depending on if you're equally or less willing to fraud using your real name.
Also, if Democrats vote a hundred times and barely overcome the Republican votes, does that mean voter turnout is actually only half of what it seems? And does that mean there are a hundred times as many Republicans as Democrats and the Republicans still can't win? Are the Democrats that impressively competent?
I think it's kind of hilarious that she's caping for the incel misogynist mob that cheered for Sports Illustrated going tits up (pun intended) bc the women on the swimsuit edition didn't meet their discerning standards.
I'm assuming your team wasn't in the 2023 rugby finals.
It should be a new featured show on Twixxer: “Election Fraud with Momma Musk”
Never, ever take advice from a Republican.
Now it’s making some sense why Elon Musk is so weird and has such terrible views. And using the social media platform you destroyed to encourage voter fraud is just so conservative.
Jaysus, that slasher smile of hers is gonna give me nightmares.
ETA: Also, I should say that I liked the number of fellow travelers who responded to her with some variation on "Hey, I know you're just joking, but you should consider that some people will take you seriously and report this."
Haha, she wasn't joking. I know, because jokes are supposed to be funny, and I defy anyone to explain how this was "funny."
It's a good thing there are no musks involved with anything that involves math or logic... I've parsed it every way I can, and it's either ten votes, or one thousand.
I think you're adding in an extra factor of 10.
10 names = 10 votes. Do each of those 10 votes at 10 polling stations. 10 votes x 10 polling stations = 100 votes.
Yes, it's still batshit insane and wildly illegal, but it does equal 100 votes. That'll get thrown out, assuming they don't notice that they've already seen you at twice under a different name, but it's 100 votes.
(Also, too -- I guess you would need to do this in a state with same-day registration? Because unless you're stealing the names of 10 registered voters, you're not going to be able to just waltz up to the poll worker and say, "I'm I. P. Freely, and I'm here to get my ballot" unless you can register there. In which case you'll also need fake IDs that will satisfy whatever requirements are in place. Really, it's pretty obvious she did not think this plan out very well.)
You need the fake names to vote multiple times in the same polling booth, they're one claim, so that part pans out, but why would you not vote using your real name as well? So the result should be either 101 or 110 votes, depending on if you're equally or less willing to fraud using your real name.
Also, if Democrats vote a hundred times and barely overcome the Republican votes, does that mean voter turnout is actually only half of what it seems? And does that mean there are a hundred times as many Republicans as Democrats and the Republicans still can't win? Are the Democrats that impressively competent?
Cruella de Rohm.
I think it's kind of hilarious that she's caping for the incel misogynist mob that cheered for Sports Illustrated going tits up (pun intended) bc the women on the swimsuit edition didn't meet their discerning standards.
Local woman goes insane.
Eh, they can’t all be the guy who invented Task Manager or Leslie Nielsen.
Hey Robyn, give us some notice next time you post a photograph of Maye Musk. Ew.
Talk about "chicken wire" mama. No wonder Elon is the way he is.
Per my close personal friend Google:
Incitement to Imminent Lawless Action
The First Amendment does not protect speech that incites people to break the law, including to commit acts of violence.
The shit doesn't fall far from the bat, does it?
"And then give me those Dalmatian puppies!"
"On Election Day, have 10 fake names, go to 10 polling booths and vote 10 times. That’s 100 votes, and it’s not illegal."
`
Yes, by all means do this, and be sure to let us know how it works out for ya. I'm sure you totally won't go to jail or anything.
beetlejuice... beetlejuice......
She looks like she wants to eat my skin.
Nobody likes finding out they are the "baddy" that no one likes. Much easier to blame it on underwear gnomes.
Skumom is a skum as is her spawn. These people really think they are above the law. Show us how the fraud is done Mrs Skum!