217 Comments

Might've been a Polaroid. Instant, ya know.

Expand full comment

So that's what they call it when you think your boss is doing unethical/possibly illegal stuff and you decide you can't work for them and/or you point it out and get asked to leave.

Expand full comment

Or Ryan Zinke.

Expand full comment

Two words: Blake Farenthold. He's still got a job.

Expand full comment

Only illegal to investigate Republican presidents.

Expand full comment

Rape? Meh, just another day at the office.

Campaign finance violations? Ohshitohshitohshitohshit!!!!

Expand full comment

I hope it does sink lower. I don't really have an issue with negative campaigning. As long as it's restricted to going negative on the GOPers.

Expand full comment

Ahhhh , something happened all the way to the White House ,for that " great American Heeeero ,Greitens " .

Expand full comment

I'm winding up...aaand the pitch!

Expand full comment

I got something bigger to throw. https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

Expand full comment

Thanks, $5F. I never read 50 Shades of Gray; it was fan fiction for Twilight, which I've also not read. I know some women around my age who were titillated by 50; I disdained it as Mommy Porn. Then again, unlike yours truly, they'd never worked in actual dungeons. Unlike them, I know what a pain in the ass a sex slave can be.

Greitens is not a Master, he's a Disaster.

Expand full comment

He's a Republican.

Expand full comment

Yes. He is. Which is why he covered for the GOPer Governor until it wasn't advantageous for him to do it anymore.

That needs to be an issue the Dems hit on and hit on hard. That not only did he attempt to cover up sexual and financial crimes for his friend, but he abandoned his friend as soon as it looked like continuing to cover up would hurt his own ambitions.

Not only is he a willing to do illegal shit, but he isn't even to be trusted by his own allies.

The Dems whouldn't trust him, but they need to hammer it home that even his own nominal allies shouldn't trust him.

Expand full comment

Going high just means, and only ever meant, do not become them to fight them.

I know you were snarking, but that one just irks we from people who should know better. It;s right up there with saying the 1st Amendment means that, by law, there are no repercussions to what anyone says. It's a deliberate misunderstanding from people who think nice=good or that they have to be 100% non offensive to their opposition to be effective.

Expand full comment

IC4WYDT

Expand full comment

This deserves many upfists.

Expand full comment