" No lawyer on earth is going to put Trump on the witness stand and allow DA Willis to cross examine him — although it would be amazing, and you could sell tickets to it on Pay-Per-View and pay off the national debt." - Yeah. I'd pay some ridiculous streaming fee for that.
I think he had to give up his seat in Congress. The walls were closing in on him with the Red Dome scandal where he paid them $45k to harvest ballots for him. Though, according to the Trumpers, harvesting ballots is only illegal when the Dems do it.
“Initial Notice Regarding Removal,” is not a thing under the Federal Rules. Nothing like it in the federal Judicial Code. I know a few federal judges who would respond to a subsequent removal motion with fuck you, you filed document that was a general appearance in the state proceedings so you waived your option to remove! Very clear in the case law that you can't fuck around with trying to play in state court but say your don't want to stick around. Once you appear you stay appeared. Wouldn't that be a hoot.
And lest we forget, the liberal Rock community did a worldwide tribute after 9/11, and the conservatives didn't like that at all. Narrated by Robin Williams.
DA Willis ought to argue that his "initial notice" is in fact his motion and that he burned his shot at it by failing to support the motion.
I mean, is this some kind of ED thing? "This is my initial notice that I might get a boner, but it'll be a couple of weeks before we know." Yeah, mushroom man, put it away, you ain't getting anybody off, including yourself.
Trump has filed a motion on Monday to disqualify Judge Chutkan from overseeing the criminal case against him, claiming that her public statements would prejudice his right to a fair trial in US District Court in Washington, DC.
The PAB is confused. His standard delay tactics are irrelevant in this context. This is not a civil case between him and some subcontractor. This is a criminal case, the locomotive is coming down the tracks, and he's walking the crossties between the rails.
I'm in the 'dunk the whole garment in whatever spilled' camp, that way it all matches. Speaking of catch up, I still want to know the details of his registering to vote in multiple states, I'm sure it wasn't an honest mistake.
" No lawyer on earth is going to put Trump on the witness stand and allow DA Willis to cross examine him — although it would be amazing, and you could sell tickets to it on Pay-Per-View and pay off the national debt." - Yeah. I'd pay some ridiculous streaming fee for that.
"161 overt acts" 1 6 1 == A F A == cLeArLy An aNtIfA pLoT!!1!
1+6+1=8, which means…fucked if I know, actually…
But 16+1 = 17, and Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet, so...
🤯
A day when Mark Meadows gets kicked in the fuck is a good day.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/10/ginni-thomas-leonard-leo-citizens-united-00108082
Just think Mark, you gave up your seat in Congress for this.
I think he had to give up his seat in Congress. The walls were closing in on him with the Red Dome scandal where he paid them $45k to harvest ballots for him. Though, according to the Trumpers, harvesting ballots is only illegal when the Dems do it.
ain't no 'lection stealin' part of nobody's day job
“Initial Notice Regarding Removal,” is not a thing under the Federal Rules. Nothing like it in the federal Judicial Code. I know a few federal judges who would respond to a subsequent removal motion with fuck you, you filed document that was a general appearance in the state proceedings so you waived your option to remove! Very clear in the case law that you can't fuck around with trying to play in state court but say your don't want to stick around. Once you appear you stay appeared. Wouldn't that be a hoot.
"This result cannot stand in the face of federalism,..."
Take THAT, Federalist Society fraud federalists.
They're like hipsters--they're only federalists "ironically".
Well, moving the case didn't work, so ...
𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗳𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱
https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-files-motion-judge-federal-election-interference-case/story?id=103097601
Oh yeah, that will work swimmingly!!!
Of course he does 🙄
Ha. Yeah, no. Take your recusal motion to Alito, because we know how he feels about the “appearance of impropriety.”
Because he is a p**** ass b****!
Because he is a pussy ass bitch!!!!
Both!
And lest we forget, the liberal Rock community did a worldwide tribute after 9/11, and the conservatives didn't like that at all. Narrated by Robin Williams.
Neal Young, covering John Lennon's "Imagine":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R15uLXHqMyo
Limp Bizkit & Johnny Rzeznik nailing Pink Floyd's "I Wish You Were Here"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PD4Ri7C74xA
Tom Petty bringing game:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXVQCKtPp40
And many others.
I don't think the conservatives were too happy with "Killing In The Name Of."
Heck, put the Lector mask on him and he could be in "Silence of the Lambs".
DA Willis ought to argue that his "initial notice" is in fact his motion and that he burned his shot at it by failing to support the motion.
I mean, is this some kind of ED thing? "This is my initial notice that I might get a boner, but it'll be a couple of weeks before we know." Yeah, mushroom man, put it away, you ain't getting anybody off, including yourself.
Amee Vanderpool
@girlsreallyrule
Trump has filed a motion on Monday to disqualify Judge Chutkan from overseeing the criminal case against him, claiming that her public statements would prejudice his right to a fair trial in US District Court in Washington, DC.
https://twitter.com/girlsreallyrule/status/1701339828313350587
Should have scrolled down. Since the move the case to Federal court ain't gonna work, let's try this!
Surprisedface.gif
“Initial Notice Regarding Removal”
The PAB is confused. His standard delay tactics are irrelevant in this context. This is not a civil case between him and some subcontractor. This is a criminal case, the locomotive is coming down the tracks, and he's walking the crossties between the rails.
But he keeps listening to Jethro Tull and "...but it could slow down..."
This seems more appropriate:
Driving that train
High on cocaine
Casey Jones you better
Watch your speed
Trouble ahead
Trouble behind
Runs the all-time loser
Headlong to his death
Death? Did someone say prison cell?
How does the judge not understand that, when the boss asks you to do crimes and misdemeanors, you ask how high crimes and misdemeanors?
He'd have a better shot at getting exonerated if he admitted he was getting blackmailed by the Turnip.
Also, 'I had to do this because if I didn't he would yell at me' Bunch of sackless shits.
Have you ever tried to get ketchup out of cashmere?
I'm in the 'dunk the whole garment in whatever spilled' camp, that way it all matches. Speaking of catch up, I still want to know the details of his registering to vote in multiple states, I'm sure it wasn't an honest mistake.
Can we get one of those bad-law thingys?
I don't understand what you mean, because I'm not even a .... law-talkin' guy.
I'm not a lawyer. I'm just a neanderthal who survived the ice age. Your modern world both frightens and confuses me.