Sarah, like most successful grifters, is not stupid. She <i>is</i> amazingly un-educated, which leads to occasional hilarity among those not responsive to her Starburst Distortion Field.
Rollins isn&#039;t embarrassed. He&#039;s just trying to decontaminate himself so some less nutball Republican will hire him for the next go-around.
50%, then <b>46%</b>, then 52% of the <a href="https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michele_Bachmann" target="_blank">voters in her district</a> heeded you.
Only PC Zealots and Naive Imbeciles Aren&#039;t With Bachmann 100% On This One Who cares what Ed Rollins and Juan McTaco think Per usual, &#039;warped&#039;, Crazy Eyes Bachmann is being pilloried yet again by the Left -along with useful idiots of all stripes- for standing up and saying something many don&#039;t want to hear: that having Saudi-born Huma Abedin as Hillary&#039;s right-hand-honey at the State Department poses a potential national security threat.</i> <a href="http://reaganiterepublicanr..." target="_blank">http://reaganiterepublicanr......</a>
<i>&quot;And Commie Mom was totally right.&quot;</i>
Everyone faces this moment, when they realize their Commie Mom was right. We lose the spark of rebellion and start to look on the next generation in a bemused way, thinking &quot;someday you too will regret that wild hairstyle or tattoo or that video you put on youporn&quot;. It&#039;s the circle of life.
Yes, Michele sometimes has difficulty with her facts. Just like the Holocost was impolite, and Ebola infection is unpleasant.
Worst marry, fuck, kill ever.
So - are you talking about Rove, now?
Or Rmoney&#039;s incompetent campaign manager?
I&#039;d take nuts over evil, generally. Works out about the same in this campaign season though.
Sarah, like most successful grifters, is not stupid. She <i>is</i> amazingly un-educated, which leads to occasional hilarity among those not responsive to her Starburst Distortion Field.
Rollins isn&#039;t embarrassed. He&#039;s just trying to decontaminate himself so some less nutball Republican will hire him for the next go-around.
50%, then <b>46%</b>, then 52% of the <a href="https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michele_Bachmann" target="_blank">voters in her district</a> heeded you.
Yet.
I believe her existing district was engineered &quot;safe Republican&quot;.
Rollins hopes it will be good for another paying gig in future.
And in wingnuttery:<i>
Only PC Zealots and Naive Imbeciles Aren&#039;t With Bachmann 100% On This One Who cares what Ed Rollins and Juan McTaco think Per usual, &#039;warped&#039;, Crazy Eyes Bachmann is being pilloried yet again by the Left -along with useful idiots of all stripes- for standing up and saying something many don&#039;t want to hear: that having Saudi-born Huma Abedin as Hillary&#039;s right-hand-honey at the State Department poses a potential national security threat.</i> <a href="http://reaganiterepublicanr..." target="_blank">http://reaganiterepublicanr......</a>
John McTaco?
<i>&quot;And Commie Mom was totally right.&quot;</i>
Everyone faces this moment, when they realize their Commie Mom was right. We lose the spark of rebellion and start to look on the next generation in a bemused way, thinking &quot;someday you too will regret that wild hairstyle or tattoo or that video you put on youporn&quot;. It&#039;s the circle of life.
More like a box of orphans otherwise known to the Bachmann clan as government paychecks.
To discover that there is any such thing is what&#039;s fascinating.
I&#039;d love it if Hill limited her comments to a brief, &quot;Bachmann is nuts. Further comments are unnecessary.&quot;
Or, he means that there are facts, they exist, and a number of them spell trouble for Michele Bachman&#039;s ambitions and agenda.