390 Comments

Either way he won.

Expand full comment

The Talking Empty Heads of Fox- they outrank the Supreme Court?

Expand full comment

No, that’s Dale Jarrett, who (fun fact) whose wife caught him cheating with his young and lovely PR person and thereafter required him to have older women and/or men on his support team. Source: know one of those older women.

But Dale does know more law than Gregggggg

Expand full comment

Number 5 is probably what the spewers of nonsense are relying on since malice does not equal stoooopidity.

Expand full comment

Gregg Jarrett? The guy who went on the air on Fox TOTALLY SHITFACED, and was sent to rehab? That Greg Jarrett? Yeah, the guy who was released from the drunktank, and went straight to the airport bar, got TOTALLY SHITFACED and was arrested on the spot? These fucktards have all the credibility of dung beetles.

Expand full comment

I wonder what state Bar association this yak-off belongs to? Most Bar associations have catch-all rules about lawyers who bring disgrace on the profession through unethical conduct. (I know, that doesn't fit the stereotype) A public petition for an investigation into his conduct might actually force them to do something.Just a thought.

Expand full comment

Oh FFS. At this point, Seth Rogen and James Franco might as well make an unflattering parody film about the Trump regime, just so we can see all the toadies on Fox do their best impression of an outraged Ri Chun-hee. https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

Expand full comment

Get back to work. Commenting on Wonkette isn't billable.

Expand full comment

Only the bestest and the smartest says Trumpo the Dumbo.

Expand full comment

Did this guy EVER go to law school? We learned that, if you're going to cite a case, you'd better cite it EXACTLY VERBATIM. Geeeez.

Expand full comment

Honestly, at this point, law schools are little more than 3 year bar prep courses. Of course, they're followed by a 6-8 week bar prep course. And if you move to another jurisdiction and aren't covered by reciprocity rules, you can expect to take a bar prep course.

Oh, and if you go to an unaccredited school in California, you get to take an extra bar exam!

None of that will actually prepare you to practice law.

Expand full comment

According to Swampay vs. Yo Mama, 459, Fed Sup 42d, 394 204, if you make up some random bullshit case number you can claim anything you want to is true. You could look it up. (you can't look it up, it's bullshit)

Expand full comment

Things had improved, but in recent years incoming classes saw massive declines in both LSAT scores and GPAs. The trend is starting to reverse, but it will be a good, long while before lawyers have the credentials they used to have.

Don't get me started on declines in research, writing and analytical skills.

Expand full comment

I’m just a civil attorney with only 18 years experience, but I’m fairly certain that intentionally misleading people, especially judges, by falsely offering quoted passages from case law that do not actually appear in those opinions is an ethical violation and should result in State Bar sanctions. Probably why they aren’t actually filing anything in court, but rather attempting to mislead the public through propaganda agents like Fox Propaganda Network. Because that’s just good, clean fun! Take that, libtard lawyers who actually read cases! Boooyaaaaa!

Expand full comment

I remember we had talked about the pins the other day and I wanted to mention that I remember my mom bought me mine for a graduation present. I will dig it out and get a pic if I think of it to show you.

Expand full comment

Here's me hoping he was turbo trolled by his interns/clerk/paralegal/anyone. And that person is today's hero(ine).

Expand full comment