Oh conservative blogger and Fox News contributor Steven Crowder, Pedobear, really? That is how you are dressed while you steal children's candy to "redistribute" it to make your waggish point about taxes = theft or whatever your bullshit is today? Sadface, Steven Crowder. Sadface! But let us get on to the "meat" of your "argument." Is it as clever and hilarious as your thing about Batman? (No. Nothing could ever be as
You'll be able to answer that yourself, when Dick comes down your chimney in the dark of night in the middle of winter, to leave your family gifts.
Why didn&#039;t he dress up as Mitt Romney, and promise the kids he&#039;ll let the ones with more candy than everyone keep it all, and also simultaneously be able to give the fattest kid even <i>more</i> of the candy he takes away, and also not take candy because he has plans to change the formula for candy taking.
The kids will totally understand!
Mostly by saying &quot;this guy shouldn&#039;t be in charge of anything, not even candy distribution,&quot; but still.
What a joke of a comparison! A true comparison would show the kids in charge knowing where all the candy is , setting up all the rules for trick or treating, and then tying up the other kids hands and feet. Then you get to see the kids with all of the candy telling everyone how hard they worked for it.
...holy shyt, can someone please hit this shyt pi&ntilde;ata with a shovel please!!! I love the hyper-simplification of fiscal policy! Yeah, candy and taxes are the exact god-damn thing! Obviously &quot;candy&quot; is used to support our infrastructure and social programs.
Good lesson about the downside of Communism, maybe. Regarding progressive taxation, ehh, not so much. Not to worry -- I suspect the kids are smarter than this fuckwit.
...let them eat cake, errr I mean candy!
You&#039;ll be able to answer that yourself, when Dick comes down your chimney in the dark of night in the middle of winter, to leave your family gifts.
And secretly videotaping them.
One tube for each nostril?
Why didn&#039;t he dress up as Mitt Romney, and promise the kids he&#039;ll let the ones with more candy than everyone keep it all, and also simultaneously be able to give the fattest kid even <i>more</i> of the candy he takes away, and also not take candy because he has plans to change the formula for candy taking.
The kids will totally understand!
Mostly by saying &quot;this guy shouldn&#039;t be in charge of anything, not even candy distribution,&quot; but still.
Prepubescent morality is the most reliable guide for a civil society.
&quot;I got this candy <i>myself,</i> without any stupid liberals giving me a free handout!&quot;
I didn&#039;t watch - how much did he take from the kids in order to pay for the streetlights, or the police who were on duty that night?
What a joke of a comparison! A true comparison would show the kids in charge knowing where all the candy is , setting up all the rules for trick or treating, and then tying up the other kids hands and feet. Then you get to see the kids with all of the candy telling everyone how hard they worked for it.
...holy shyt, can someone please hit this shyt pi&ntilde;ata with a shovel please!!! I love the hyper-simplification of fiscal policy! Yeah, candy and taxes are the exact god-damn thing! Obviously &quot;candy&quot; is used to support our infrastructure and social programs.
My God&mdash;sharing with those who have less. These people will do <i>anything!</i> Those kids worked for that candy.
No wait, it was just given to them. In fact they begged for a handout from the authorities/government/parents.
There&#039;s a lesson here somewhere. Oh yeah: Obama is sozialist!
Good lesson about the downside of Communism, maybe. Regarding progressive taxation, ehh, not so much. Not to worry -- I suspect the kids are smarter than this fuckwit.