16 Comments
User's avatar
William's avatar

Since this was in Florida, clearly the cop will walk because he was standing his ground against the guy who was armed with deadly popcorn.

MonkeyMotion's avatar

Too bad that -- once again -- there weren't a bunch of 'good' guys in that theater packing heat who could've taken out 'bad' guy Curtis Reeves before he took out Chad Oulson.

Wait. Or was Chad Oulson the 'bad' guy? Whatever.

Point is, a whole bunch more people with more guns would've solved the problem. Right, NRA?

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

This guy ablows as a psychiatrist

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

Kenneth, what is the frequency?

The Quirk's avatar

Uh, aBlow, the guy "interfacing w/ the machine" was NOT the dehumanizer; that would be the guy interfacing w/ his gun.

The Quirk's avatar

But there was popcorn-throwing involved also too!

Msgr MΩment classic ☑️'s avatar

So, was he on Fox with other experts, like, you know, a sort of Death Panel?

Msgr MΩment classic ☑️'s avatar

Data rage?! Why, I oughta.....

with votes, obvs.

TundraGrifter's avatar

Kind of like abstinence "education" works wonderfully until one night it suddenly doesn't.

TundraGrifter's avatar

I'd like to know who talked Dr. A. Blow into becoming a brain donor.

Good_Gawd_Yall - Unperson's avatar

I'm confused. None of the words he used, including "there" and "is," make sense in the context. What he was saying was, "It's okay to murder people if they annoy you," right? Explained in 9 words, instead of with his word smorgasbord. You're welcome, "Dr" Ablowme. Now why don't you go fuck right off?

Tiny kaiju's avatar

" We know that when people interact with machines, that sometimes they feel emboldened to do things that they never would; that it could be tremendously frustrating; and that people who could be vulnerable — add in technology or a machine and things could go over-the-top and become very violent."

<a href="http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=dLk-3HPS12Q" target="_blank"> </a><a href="http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=dLk-3HPS12Q&amp\;lt\;\/a&amp\;gt\;" target="_blank"> </a><a href="http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=dLk-3HPS12Q&amp\;lt\;\/a&amp\;gt\;" target="_blank"> <a href="" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLk-3HPS12Q">http://www.youtube.com/watc..." target="_blank"> <a href="" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLk-3HPS12Q">http://www.youtube.com/watc..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLk-3HPS12Q">www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLk...

BarackMyWorld's avatar

Does not compute.

How can smart phone use make someone violent if the violent person wasn't the one using the smart phone? If smart phones made people violent, wouldn't the guy using the phone be the one who was violent? No, because this is the stupidest psychological theory ever, that's why.