"....mangy, single dude..." nice was to describe Matt Gaetz, eh Jesse.Ok you are right they are mainly people with mental issues, so who do we blame for putting them out on the street.......that would be St. Ronnie!
If you do not contribute to society through work, the only affordable housing has to be free.
And there it is. You, a human being, do not deserve shelter unless you toil. If you are unable to toil? Well, fuck you then. Your worth is inextricably tied to the surplus value you can generate for others.
If we could all get over this hill and come around to the idea that everyone deserves shelter, food, clothing, an education and so forth simply because you exist.. we'd be a better society.
Is this not just the mainstream conservative position on homelessness? I've never met a conservative who didn't agree with all this, no matter how "reasonable" they were on other social issues. Considering a lack of empathy underpins their entire political philosophy, this isn't surprising.
Just about to say that. Let's not forget the reason there are so many people with mental issues on the streets - Ronnie Raygun decided that was cheaper than keeping housed in institutions. Yet somehow the huge west coast homeless population is supposed to be proof of California's failures as a state..
A former co-irker was from Idaho, when his employer shut down and there was no work he ended up on welfare. The state of Idaho paid for his U-Haul and car trailer so he could move out of state.
Aren't these the same arseholes who also object to government action to deal with poverty and homelessness on the grounds it is better done by private charity?
'If I hunt one and kill them in the city limits.... I'M THE BAD GUY!! Biden has gone too far on his attack on freedoms!'
A modest proposal...content://com.amazon.cloud9.FileProvider/images/screenshot/1644574378522-2126572141.jpg
Your upload failed.
Considering each Fox is getting $2K a day .
"....mangy, single dude..." nice was to describe Matt Gaetz, eh Jesse.Ok you are right they are mainly people with mental issues, so who do we blame for putting them out on the street.......that would be St. Ronnie!
If you do not contribute to society through work, the only affordable housing has to be free.
And there it is. You, a human being, do not deserve shelter unless you toil. If you are unable to toil? Well, fuck you then. Your worth is inextricably tied to the surplus value you can generate for others.
If we could all get over this hill and come around to the idea that everyone deserves shelter, food, clothing, an education and so forth simply because you exist.. we'd be a better society.
Is this not just the mainstream conservative position on homelessness? I've never met a conservative who didn't agree with all this, no matter how "reasonable" they were on other social issues. Considering a lack of empathy underpins their entire political philosophy, this isn't surprising.
Now that is an attack.
Just about to say that. Let's not forget the reason there are so many people with mental issues on the streets - Ronnie Raygun decided that was cheaper than keeping housed in institutions. Yet somehow the huge west coast homeless population is supposed to be proof of California's failures as a state..
I'd come up with a million in cash just to see him perp-walked
Arrghh. It was a Soylent Green poster...
Wasn't it Reagan that forced many mentally ill people onto the streets? And aren't a large part of them homeless?
Yes.
A former co-irker was from Idaho, when his employer shut down and there was no work he ended up on welfare. The state of Idaho paid for his U-Haul and car trailer so he could move out of state.
Aren't these the same arseholes who also object to government action to deal with poverty and homelessness on the grounds it is better done by private charity?
You must have to be to vote conservative.