233 Comments
User's avatar
pussygrabber in chief's avatar

If courts are going to require that laws specifically say "no upskirt photos", then a lot of states aren't going to have an applicable law.

Expand full comment
Querolous's avatar

Do Black Patent Leather Shoes Really Reflect Up?

Expand full comment
pussygrabber in chief's avatar

Upfist for pig only.

Expand full comment
pussygrabber in chief's avatar

Exactly! Letter of the law! No expectation of privacy!

Expand full comment
pussygrabber in chief's avatar

You should be okay as long as your privates are just passively existing and not actively performing any yard work.

Expand full comment
ThatDale's avatar

Passively existing? Trust me, at my age...

Expand full comment
Shananigan's avatar

Thanks for the visual.

Expand full comment
pussygrabber in chief's avatar

It's interesting to compare the issues on which courts go all "letter of the law" and the issues (second amendment e.g.) on which they feel less constrained by the letter (or entire phrase).

Expand full comment
TundraGrifter's avatar

A peach of a pair! But more "down blouse" than "up skirt."

Expand full comment
SkokieDaddy - wiener dog dad's avatar

Absolutely. And no creepy photog needed. She put everything on display gleefully using her assets to increase her fame. Google more of the pictures, they make today's actresses 'nip-slips" look like amateur hour.

Expand full comment
Shananigan's avatar

But, god. Sophia Loren's face was PERFECTION.

Expand full comment
theCryptofishist's avatar

And the judge who wrote the opinion was a woman! (well, based on the assumption that Elizabeth is a girl's name.) So, are up-robe photos okay?

Expand full comment
theCryptofishist's avatar

And the gingerness of it all... Gingers are the possessions of the devil.

[Note: I don't actually believe that, and while I have to snigger when gingers say "Ginger-hating is the last acceptable prejudice"--like I snigger at anyone saying that--I don't like people hassling other people. However, it was one of the things I thought when I saw the picture.]

Expand full comment
theCryptofishist's avatar

She should sue the store.(Or is that the lawsuit that she lost? I thought, ahem, assumed, that it was a criminal prosecution.)

Expand full comment
Incoming Ham's avatar

There was a whole business in my town that did "upskirt" photos of models and creeping civilians.

Expand full comment
HazooToo's avatar

Probably both, sadly.

Expand full comment