Maybe the Republican National Committee should consider sending all its party’s presidential candidates on a round-the-world cruise for the next two years so they can’t spend that time saying stupid shit on television and turning off the American public. Take Marco Rubio. Over the weekend he senator from the great insane state of Florida gave an interview to Jonathan Karl for ABC’s
Unless, of course, they were <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/St._Bartholomew&#039\;s_Day_massacre" target="_blank">in a hurry</a>.
<i>Congress shall <b>make no law respecting an establishment</b> of religion, or <b>prohibiting the free exercise thereof</b>; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances</i>
&quot;make no law respecting an establishment&quot;: prevents imposing of religion.
&quot;prohibiting the free exercise thereof&quot;: guarantees right to exercise religion.
<i>&quot;Our climate is always changing. And what they have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research, and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that&rsquo;s directly and almost solely attributable to manmade activity.&quot;</i>
Sixty years of research, thousands of years of data.
But let&#039;s apply this reasoning to tax-cuts and the economy:<blockquote>Our economy is always changing. And what Republicans have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research on tax cuts and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that&rsquo;s directly and almost solely attributable to economic growth.</blockquote>
&quot;They simply want to silence us.&quot;
We certainly do wish that they&#039;d <b>shut the fuck up</b>, but that&#039;s not quite the same thing. Leave it to the Xtards not to know the difference.
Jim Hightower suggested &quot;The Apollo Project&quot; - massive Federal government support for sustainable energy. Instead of subsidizing oil companies. President Obama has made a good start in this direction.
David Suzuki pointed out the tremendous economic benefits from the late 1950&#039;s early 1960&#039;s &quot;space race.&quot; Fighting climate change could have a huge positive impact on our national - and world - economy.
Jindal&#039;s half right, you know: we don&#039;t want to debate, because there is no reason to respect the opinion of anyone who hasn&#039;t gone to the trouble of forming one.
I thought <i>Republican airbags</i> meant Rush Limbaugh and Bill O&#039;Reilly.
Ok...but your original statement is still part wrong...
i can&#039;t believe this guy is really this dumb.
which makes me even madder.
Kentucky has always lacked a coastline; if we elect Rubio perhaps we could have one.
Unless, of course, they were <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/St._Bartholomew&#039\;s_Day_massacre" target="_blank">in a hurry</a>.
(WWJK?)
Good luck even finding a candidate . . . that&#039;s a pretty high standard for today&#039;s GOP.
It was written to do both.
<i>Congress shall <b>make no law respecting an establishment</b> of religion, or <b>prohibiting the free exercise thereof</b>; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances</i>
&quot;make no law respecting an establishment&quot;: prevents imposing of religion.
&quot;prohibiting the free exercise thereof&quot;: guarantees right to exercise religion.
<i>&quot;Our climate is always changing. And what they have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research, and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that&rsquo;s directly and almost solely attributable to manmade activity.&quot;</i>
Sixty years of research, thousands of years of data.
But let&#039;s apply this reasoning to tax-cuts and the economy:<blockquote>Our economy is always changing. And what Republicans have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research on tax cuts and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that&rsquo;s directly and almost solely attributable to economic growth.</blockquote>
We trust in God. All others pay cash.
I can just see the questions from Breitbart&#039;s Home of Walking Colostomy Bags:
&quot;The Democrat Party: merely evil or super-genius evil?&quot;
&quot;Do you feel the power of Christ through your decisions?&quot;
&quot;Are you a full-throated 2nd Amendment supporter, or a coward?&quot;
&quot;They simply want to silence us.&quot;
We certainly do wish that they&#039;d <b>shut the fuck up</b>, but that&#039;s not quite the same thing. Leave it to the Xtards not to know the difference.
If Rubio is ever entitled to Secret Service protection during the campaign, might I suggest Twerp 1 or Ito as code names?
&quot;GOP Candidates For President In 2016 Already Getting A Jump On Looking Like Ignorant Mullet-Heads&quot;
This seems rather unkind to Mullet-heads everywhere.
I saw that video on Faux News. Of course, Faux said they were Koreans looking at the wrecked passenger ship.
Jim Hightower suggested &quot;The Apollo Project&quot; - massive Federal government support for sustainable energy. Instead of subsidizing oil companies. President Obama has made a good start in this direction.
David Suzuki pointed out the tremendous economic benefits from the late 1950&#039;s early 1960&#039;s &quot;space race.&quot; Fighting climate change could have a huge positive impact on our national - and world - economy.
<a href="http:\/\/billmoyers.com\/episode\/full-show-time-to-get-real-on-climate-change\/" target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-time-to-g...">http://billmoyers.com/episo...
Jindal&#039;s half right, you know: we don&#039;t want to debate, because there is no reason to respect the opinion of anyone who hasn&#039;t gone to the trouble of forming one.