Maybe the Republican National Committee should consider sending all its party’s presidential candidates on a round-the-world cruise for the next two years so they can’t spend that time saying stupid shit on television and turning off the American public.
Unless, of course, they were <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/St._Bartholomew&#039\;s_Day_massacre" target="_blank">in a hurry</a>.
<i>Congress shall <b>make no law respecting an establishment</b> of religion, or <b>prohibiting the free exercise thereof</b>; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances</i>
&quot;make no law respecting an establishment&quot;: prevents imposing of religion.
&quot;prohibiting the free exercise thereof&quot;: guarantees right to exercise religion.
<i>&quot;Our climate is always changing. And what they have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research, and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that&rsquo;s directly and almost solely attributable to manmade activity.&quot;</i>
Sixty years of research, thousands of years of data.
But let&#039;s apply this reasoning to tax-cuts and the economy:<blockquote>Our economy is always changing. And what Republicans have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research on tax cuts and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that&rsquo;s directly and almost solely attributable to economic growth.</blockquote>
&quot;They simply want to silence us.&quot;
We certainly do wish that they&#039;d <b>shut the fuck up</b>, but that&#039;s not quite the same thing. Leave it to the Xtards not to know the difference.
Jim Hightower suggested &quot;The Apollo Project&quot; - massive Federal government support for sustainable energy. Instead of subsidizing oil companies. President Obama has made a good start in this direction.
David Suzuki pointed out the tremendous economic benefits from the late 1950&#039;s early 1960&#039;s &quot;space race.&quot; Fighting climate change could have a huge positive impact on our national - and world - economy.
Jindal&#039;s half right, you know: we don&#039;t want to debate, because there is no reason to respect the opinion of anyone who hasn&#039;t gone to the trouble of forming one.
I thought <i>Republican airbags</i> meant Rush Limbaugh and Bill O&#039;Reilly.
Ok...but your original statement is still part wrong...
i can&#039;t believe this guy is really this dumb.
which makes me even madder.
Kentucky has always lacked a coastline; if we elect Rubio perhaps we could have one.
Unless, of course, they were <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/St._Bartholomew&#039\;s_Day_massacre" target="_blank">in a hurry</a>.
(WWJK?)
Good luck even finding a candidate . . . that&#039;s a pretty high standard for today&#039;s GOP.
It was written to do both.
<i>Congress shall <b>make no law respecting an establishment</b> of religion, or <b>prohibiting the free exercise thereof</b>; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances</i>
&quot;make no law respecting an establishment&quot;: prevents imposing of religion.
&quot;prohibiting the free exercise thereof&quot;: guarantees right to exercise religion.
<i>&quot;Our climate is always changing. And what they have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research, and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that&rsquo;s directly and almost solely attributable to manmade activity.&quot;</i>
Sixty years of research, thousands of years of data.
But let&#039;s apply this reasoning to tax-cuts and the economy:<blockquote>Our economy is always changing. And what Republicans have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research on tax cuts and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that&rsquo;s directly and almost solely attributable to economic growth.</blockquote>
We trust in God. All others pay cash.
I can just see the questions from Breitbart&#039;s Home of Walking Colostomy Bags:
&quot;The Democrat Party: merely evil or super-genius evil?&quot;
&quot;Do you feel the power of Christ through your decisions?&quot;
&quot;Are you a full-throated 2nd Amendment supporter, or a coward?&quot;
&quot;They simply want to silence us.&quot;
We certainly do wish that they&#039;d <b>shut the fuck up</b>, but that&#039;s not quite the same thing. Leave it to the Xtards not to know the difference.
If Rubio is ever entitled to Secret Service protection during the campaign, might I suggest Twerp 1 or Ito as code names?
&quot;GOP Candidates For President In 2016 Already Getting A Jump On Looking Like Ignorant Mullet-Heads&quot;
This seems rather unkind to Mullet-heads everywhere.
I saw that video on Faux News. Of course, Faux said they were Koreans looking at the wrecked passenger ship.
Jim Hightower suggested &quot;The Apollo Project&quot; - massive Federal government support for sustainable energy. Instead of subsidizing oil companies. President Obama has made a good start in this direction.
David Suzuki pointed out the tremendous economic benefits from the late 1950&#039;s early 1960&#039;s &quot;space race.&quot; Fighting climate change could have a huge positive impact on our national - and world - economy.
<a href="http:\/\/billmoyers.com\/episode\/full-show-time-to-get-real-on-climate-change\/" target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-time-to-g...">http://billmoyers.com/episo...
Jindal&#039;s half right, you know: we don&#039;t want to debate, because there is no reason to respect the opinion of anyone who hasn&#039;t gone to the trouble of forming one.