328 Comments

14 justices, including 3 chief justices, have been confirmed in election years or between election and inauguration. This is completely unprecedented. Much like a black president, which I'm sure is totally coincidental.

Expand full comment

Ask the GOP. Because they do.

Expand full comment

Seems like pretty obvious sarcasm to me, but that's just me.

Expand full comment

If (as is reasonably likely) the Dems take the Senate, there may well be a further change to the filibuster rule.

Expand full comment

I think it's possible that some jurists higher on the list just didn't want to be nominated. They may not have publicly taken themselves out of contention, but may have let Obama know that they didn't want to go through the bullshit that they knew they would have to go through. Garland knew that this would be his last chance to become a SCOTUS judge so he was willing to roll the dice.

Expand full comment

I'm an idiot... What's a poll tax?

Expand full comment

"Look - nobody's going to nominate a far-left SC judge. Nobody."Why not?

Expand full comment

Also wide stances.

Expand full comment

Literally making people pay to vote:http://www.americaslibrary....Basically, another racist Jim Crow law. It was outlawed by the 24th Amendment. The GOP have, of course, brought it back in a subtler form with their Voter ID laws that require forms of ID that cost money & are hard for poor people to obtain.

Expand full comment

There have been a couple of cases where corporations which have appealed have now settled rather than pay the costs of an appeal they can't win.

Expand full comment

...and this is the Republican establishment at work, not the Tea Trumpets. Where is a big parking-lot sized Florida sinkhole when it's really needed?

Expand full comment

The strategy you describe is one Pres. Obama has executed multiple times to approximately as much avail as Charlie Brown thinking that maybe this one time Lucy won't pull the football away at the last minute. He should've nominated a progressive jurist, No. 1 to be true to himself (if in face he is not a secret moderate Republican) and No. 2 to prevent the kind of lame-duck crap of which Ms. KGJ writes above.

Expand full comment

yeah, yet we still are only going to be granted a choice between a billionaire and a millionaire (yup, the Clintons are millionaires now). it's not like we're living in a democracy, and the C.U. decision only drove us further on down Oligarchy Road...

Expand full comment

What I'm afraid of is if Hillz gets the nomination, the Bernie supporters will be so pissed they will take their vote and go home.

Expand full comment

Pleeeeeeeeeease…

Expand full comment

Do you mean Ronnie Raygun, Antonin Scalia, or Republican Jesus?

Expand full comment