6 Comments
User's avatar
TundraGrifter's avatar

This Akin brouhaha is good news for (r)Money.

Dick Morris said it is - so it must be true.

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

I still find it scary that this fuckwad is preferred by 38% of the electorate. Anything over 15% should be cause for concern.

Maybe if they broke it down to "among respondents who know about Akin's idiotic statements", the results wouldn't be quite so horrifying. Maybe.

Fartknocker's avatar

Was the infant in the ad the result of a legitimate rape?

PsycWench's avatar

“The fact that<strike> Claire McCaskill </strike><b>Todd Akin</b> is only polling at <strike>48% </strike><b> 38% </b>after 72 hours of constant negative attacks <strike>on Todd Akin shows just how weak she is</strike><b> shows how nuts Missouri voters are </b>.

schmannity's avatar

This guy needs a legitimate skull rapin'.

Spurning Beer's avatar

It was not a forcible poll.