22 Comments

"Voyager" was actually 78 years from being interesting.

Expand full comment

You're talking about Diana "Betsy" Ross and the Supremes?

Expand full comment

Yee haw! Pew pew pew!

Expand full comment

Regular visits to massage parlors are good for the constitution, or so I've been told.

Expand full comment

You have my deepest sympathy. I know what it's like to lose a brother (who was a close friend) suddenly and way too soon. The pain is excruciating. The feeling never really goes away, even after you have pulled yourself back together. My brother still shows up quite regularly in my dreams. Sometimes it's pleasant and sometimes not. (On those occasions it is not scary, just strange.) Such a loss never, ever makes sense and you never really get over it. You ultimately just live with it. You go on with your life but you never forget this moment.

Expand full comment

That image, the one of my brother moments after he died, was what dominated for several months afterward whenever I thought about him. In time (it's been seven years now since he died) it gave way to images of him (and us) when he was alive. Memories and images that are no doubt too painful to recall right now for you, as they were for me right after his passing. Early on when he appeared in my dreams it was as he looked shortly before the end. He didn't actually talk to me but I got the impression that wherever he was now, he was whole and no longer in any pain. Now, years later, when he shows up in my dreams they are images of us together long before his passing, doing things that we typically did back then. Images from the time of his death no longer dominate. My interpretation is that he wants me to (and I want to) remember him as the living breathing person that he was in life, and to no longer dwell so much on how that life ended. Keeping him alive in my memory means remembering him when he was alive, when he was full of life. i simply couldn't deal with those kinds of memories in the immediate aftermath though because it was too painful.

Expand full comment

I cannot even begin to imagine your pain. My thoughts go out to you.

Expand full comment

No, no. The One Amendment to Rule Them All is, quite obviously, the 2nd.

Expand full comment

Thank you. Cranked it up to start the day.

Expand full comment

Half of Issa's dumbfuck base can't tell a Constitutional clause from commie socialist propaganda. I wonder how many will stop following the clod, now that he's spammed their feeds?

Expand full comment

Wait a minute! There are non-gun parts of the Constitution? I did not see that memo.

Expand full comment

That Kirk, always lawyering his way around the Prime Directive.

Expand full comment

Better yet, here, have some Saurian brandy.

Expand full comment

NRA BILL OF RIGHTS First Amendment: Freedom to speak, assemble, print, and petition about guns. Second Amendment: Guns. Third Amendment: Right to use guns to prevent quartering troops. Fourth Amendment: Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures of guns. Fifth Amendment: Legal process guaranteed by guns. Sixth Amendment: Speedy and public trial if use of gun while standing ground. Seventh Amendment: Jury trials for gun owners standing ground. Eighth Amendment: Prevents cruel and unusual punishment but permits firing squads. Ninth Amendment: All gun rights not restricted are retained by the people. Tenth Amendment: States' rights to regulate guns.

Expand full comment

Well, he <em>did</em> get that commendation for original thinking. So of course he would find ways to adhere to the spirit of the rule while running roughshod over the letter.

Expand full comment

The Yangs know more about the Constitution than the GOP does at this point.

Expand full comment