7 Comments

I imagine that what Colbert would tell Studs if he could is what we all would tell him: "Thank you."

Expand full comment

Stephen has been using the conservative pundit conceit for 17 years now, brilliantly. How will he do on late-night television without it? I don't think he will be happy being just funny. He is a man with a mission. Soapboxes aren't usually funny, which is the genius of the Colbert pundit persona. Maybe the network will let him continue the premise. I would if it were my network.

I think the serious tone of the podcast rubbed off on me. This comment was snarkless. Or would have been if comments were allowed.

Expand full comment

Hey, hey, hey! I didn't get no assslap!! </mope>

Expand full comment

Because Martin Lawrence was busy?

Expand full comment

We have Time Warner Cable. How can you not know this?

Expand full comment

Attention Fartknocker . . . you can actually get <i>paid</i> for what you're doing!

Expand full comment

"with a bit of a shift in emphasis from Terkel, who wanted to know how people feel about their jobs, to much more detail about how the job gets done." It is with this "bit of a shift" that the focus is taken off the thoughts and feelings of the person and the job is thrust to the foreground. Plotz completely misses the point.

Expand full comment