23 Comments
User's avatar
π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

“I don’t want to force my views on others ... I just vote for legislation that does it."

Expand full comment
π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Hey, it ain't actually <i>worship.</i> They have no idea who's behind the curtain.

Expand full comment
chascates's avatar

Adultery never appeared in the Bible?

Expand full comment
fuflans's avatar

i see the party of personal responsibility is still at it.

Expand full comment
bobbert's avatar

Gay.

Expand full comment
The Quirk's avatar

Well, they've just lost their base.

Expand full comment
The Quirk's avatar

As a sort-of Christian (Unitarian Apathetic) I'd like to think that if Cheney and the Bible were your friends, they'd produce a reaction like matter and anti-matter.

Expand full comment
The Quirk's avatar

Well, if you have sex w/ him and he likes it . . . .

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

Right, because there are so many more gay bars than regular night clubs, and no straight guy ever got a girl to come home with him from the club anyway. Plus also too while the wimminz are all about looks, gay men are renowned for having absolutely no standards when it comes to physical appearance.<br /><br />Seriously, the utter nonsense that people come up with to try to rationalize their bigotry makes my brain hurt whenever I make the mistake of thinking about it at all.

Expand full comment
Bourgeois Nerd's avatar

True. Not like Essie Mae's existence actually made him less of a segregationist or whatever.

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

This is the thing that annoys me most about the "It's a choice" crowd. I mean seriously, do they <em>really</em> think that people would <em>choose</em> to endure the massive piles of shit that have throughout history been dumped on gay people (e.g. the story of <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Alan_Turing#Conviction_for_indecency" target="_blank">Alan Turing</a>, and that's even before we get on to all the actual murders)? Do they think that buttsechs is objectively <em>that</em> much more pleasurable or something?

It just makes no sense whatsoever.

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

Of course "Israel" and "the Jews" aren't actually the same thing.

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

Don't you need to present the form to claim your toaster?

Expand full comment
Vienna Woods's avatar

Not to mention the Reagans on stem-cell research, also, too.

Expand full comment
WA Bishop's avatar

What do you mean? He's being entirely consistent with conservative principles: advocate for anything in your immediate, personal self-interest, because fuck you.

Expand full comment
diogenez's avatar

"Things Rob Portman would support if they effected him personally."

Expand full comment