His comments, notably, suggest not just that some refugees are gang members but that they might pose other problems. He even seems to suggest that people might have gone to the Bahamas so they could pose as refugees to gain admission to the United States. Trump has often spoken in this manner about potential terrorists. It’s not clear whether he was saying they went to the Bahamas before the hurricane or somehow got there afterward. His comments, notably, suggest that his squirrels have squirrels.
It's on another thread. And yeah he leaned HARD on the whole, You are a shrieking hysterical banshee a LOT. Even after being shown how "hysteria" was a woman's disease that men used to control women. His excuse: some men were too so it wasn't a woman's issue.
Hey, for the record I never said any of that. This lady is crazy. I haven't used any dog whistles or sexist terms. She just flies off the handle at any idea she didnt like and calls them that. I've told you pretty much exactly what I said (partially word for word), and you've seen how Jenny has acted.
The one term I've used that she has accused me of being sexist is when I told her to "stop being hysterical.", which is a fairly common adjective for men and women with poor emotional control. Considering how she is acting I found it apt.
How else would you describe the dozens of expletive laced rants you've gone on towards me after dozens of requests to clam down and discuss with me why you dont agree if you are so against what I've said; and now going out of your way just to make sure the one nice conversation I had yesterday is ruined?
And no. Yes I did say that, but mostly my point was that it is an insanely common word in English vernacular, and you cant just decide its sexist because you want to when there is little precedent outside of 2 or 3 op Ed's. After you denied that no one used the word non-sexistly any more, I found you dozens of recent headlines that contained the word. Then you shifted your tune to "Well, alot of people do use it, but you cant use it to describe me since I'm a woman". When I told you that these headlines described groups of people that often included women, you just went right back to shouting at me.
You are really a fucking idiot when you don't understand context. And it's funny that you keep on digging on that. And oh yeah it's me "ruining" a conversation when you were lying to her and obscuring your Ben Shapiro-esque asshole attitude towards women. It was even funnier that your stupid ass kept citing things about hysteria that referenced how disproportionately it was used on women. Jeeze, again, no wonder your wife left you.
Wow, you got a lot of sexist dog whistles in your explanation for how you aren't a sexist piece of shit. It's genuinely hilarious you went the extra mile to say "crazy" as well.
Carol. You can see what I've had to deal with for the past few days. I'm sorry y ok u got dragged into this.But you have the conversation we had yesterday. And now you have a clear demonstration of who Jenny is. Make up your own mind.
ummm, most women agree calling a woman "shrieking", "hysterical", or a "banshee" are sexist terms. You've been shown multiple sources telling you as such, as well as the long medical history of how hysteria has been used primarily and overwhelmingly against women and is still used today to shut down a woman. And yet you persist, sheesh, keep on going.
It really isn't though, and it's funny you keep barreling on in that point despite numerous sources shown to you in how when directed to a woman it is a gendered insult. And yeah, constantly calling a woman "crazy" or variations of it is also sexist as shit.
But you are clearly crazy. You don't get blanket immunity from a common adjective. The point is I didnt do it to be sexist. I did it to describe your behavior. Once more. I posted tons of sources showing it used in a non sexist context (including groups of people that included women) but you just ignored them.You talk about context so much, yet you cant picture words or ideas directed at you in a non bigoted context, instead placing a blanket ban on ideas you dont like.
And there you go again. Calling a woman "crazy" because you disagree with her is also a classic misogynistic tactic. And no you didn't post any sources as such. I showed when directed at a single woman it is sexist.https://www.harpersbazaar.c...
https://www.reactiongifs.us...
hmmmm. Didn't see that. That sounds like Ben Shapiro.
I think his hue is more of a "Turmeric Hitler"
His comments, notably, suggest not just that some refugees are gang members but that they might pose other problems. He even seems to suggest that people might have gone to the Bahamas so they could pose as refugees to gain admission to the United States. Trump has often spoken in this manner about potential terrorists. It’s not clear whether he was saying they went to the Bahamas before the hurricane or somehow got there afterward. His comments, notably, suggest that his squirrels have squirrels.
It's on another thread. And yeah he leaned HARD on the whole, You are a shrieking hysterical banshee a LOT. Even after being shown how "hysteria" was a woman's disease that men used to control women. His excuse: some men were too so it wasn't a woman's issue.
Hey, for the record I never said any of that. This lady is crazy. I haven't used any dog whistles or sexist terms. She just flies off the handle at any idea she didnt like and calls them that. I've told you pretty much exactly what I said (partially word for word), and you've seen how Jenny has acted.
The one term I've used that she has accused me of being sexist is when I told her to "stop being hysterical.", which is a fairly common adjective for men and women with poor emotional control. Considering how she is acting I found it apt.
How else would you describe the dozens of expletive laced rants you've gone on towards me after dozens of requests to clam down and discuss with me why you dont agree if you are so against what I've said; and now going out of your way just to make sure the one nice conversation I had yesterday is ruined?
And no. Yes I did say that, but mostly my point was that it is an insanely common word in English vernacular, and you cant just decide its sexist because you want to when there is little precedent outside of 2 or 3 op Ed's. After you denied that no one used the word non-sexistly any more, I found you dozens of recent headlines that contained the word. Then you shifted your tune to "Well, alot of people do use it, but you cant use it to describe me since I'm a woman". When I told you that these headlines described groups of people that often included women, you just went right back to shouting at me.
You are really a fucking idiot when you don't understand context. And it's funny that you keep on digging on that. And oh yeah it's me "ruining" a conversation when you were lying to her and obscuring your Ben Shapiro-esque asshole attitude towards women. It was even funnier that your stupid ass kept citing things about hysteria that referenced how disproportionately it was used on women. Jeeze, again, no wonder your wife left you.
Wow, you got a lot of sexist dog whistles in your explanation for how you aren't a sexist piece of shit. It's genuinely hilarious you went the extra mile to say "crazy" as well.
Carol. You can see what I've had to deal with for the past few days. I'm sorry y ok u got dragged into this.But you have the conversation we had yesterday. And now you have a clear demonstration of who Jenny is. Make up your own mind.
ummm, most women agree calling a woman "shrieking", "hysterical", or a "banshee" are sexist terms. You've been shown multiple sources telling you as such, as well as the long medical history of how hysteria has been used primarily and overwhelmingly against women and is still used today to shut down a woman. And yet you persist, sheesh, keep on going.
Yea, you've lost it. Hysterical is a common term for both genders. Once again, I'm sorry Carol.
It really isn't though, and it's funny you keep barreling on in that point despite numerous sources shown to you in how when directed to a woman it is a gendered insult. And yeah, constantly calling a woman "crazy" or variations of it is also sexist as shit.
But you are clearly crazy. You don't get blanket immunity from a common adjective. The point is I didnt do it to be sexist. I did it to describe your behavior. Once more. I posted tons of sources showing it used in a non sexist context (including groups of people that included women) but you just ignored them.You talk about context so much, yet you cant picture words or ideas directed at you in a non bigoted context, instead placing a blanket ban on ideas you dont like.
And there you go again. Calling a woman "crazy" because you disagree with her is also a classic misogynistic tactic. And no you didn't post any sources as such. I showed when directed at a single woman it is sexist.https://www.harpersbazaar.c...
Also pretty sure we can stack on "ableist scum" to the shit you are.