452 Comments
User's avatar
Victor James Trumper's avatar

The SUPERMAJORITY PLAN TO IMPEACH TRUMP and HIS ADMINISTRATION

It will take 292 house and 67 senate votes to obtain a supermajority vote. This is the key to accomplishing anything in the house or senate. The house and senate will be able to impeach Trump and his administration for their crimes and corruption.

The Democrats are the only ones that will stand against Trump. We have to vote out as many republicans as possible.

EVERYONE IS GOING TO HAVE TO VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS IN THE NOVEMBER 3RD MIDTERM ELECTIONS TO MAKE THIS WORK

Make sure you share this with everyone you know without social media. People without social media are unaware how corrupt and detrimental Trump’s administration really is for our country. The media outlets do not post anything negative about Trump. Some people don’t even know what the midterm elections are or how important they are.

TRUMP, HIS ADMINISTRATION, HIS BILLIONAIRE PEDOPHILE NETWORK , AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY ARE MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE WORKING CLASS TO SURVIVE.

WE HAVE TO STOP THEM FROM DESTROYING THE COUNTRY

Hank Napkin's avatar

Parents! Always something. With mine it was the long hair, Rimbaud, Syd Barrett, and Jerry Rubin.

Stephanie Hobbs's avatar

"We want the government out of our personal lives" they said.

insert_something_creative's avatar

"No more nanny state big government telling us how to live our lives!*"

*we're totally cool with the government forcing *other* people to live how *we* want them too though.

Victoria Preuss's avatar

Internet Stranger is a piece of digital artwork by Michael Donahue which was uploaded on May 9, 2017, according to a gallery website.

Scott Hannahs's avatar

It is time for the teachers to send notifications to ALL parents about ALL kids occasionally doing something not quite aligned with their gender. It protects the school district against any monetary suit. It protects the kids since all parents got that notice. Or it is time for the kids to do something "not aligned with their gender" to force a notice for a majority of the kids. This protects them all since the notification becomes meaningless.

"I am Sparticus!"

Fifth Dentist's avatar

"From now on, I want you to all call me 'Loretta.'"

Pexas Teat's avatar

The "nickname not derived from their name" is the perfect trojan horse here.

Lynn Veit's avatar

Khrist on a kracker....

Hank Napkin's avatar

I'm going with "Christ on a Made-in-China broomstick". A little more typing, but worth it.

kmblue187's avatar

"We haven’t checked to see whether his house has been burned to the ground yet." Probably.

LyftControlledCities's avatar

They'll just send some guy with a hammer to break his kneecaps.

kmblue187's avatar

Greaaaat cartoon panel.

Dr. No-No's avatar

Arrogant, sick SOBs. 🤨

Biff52 Lost Canadian's avatar

Idaho: So close to Canada, yet so close to hell also.

Lil Snot's avatar

"Though she be but little, she is fierce" is my evil twin's motto.

BlueSpot's avatar

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 US 503 (1969), establishes that students do not lose their First Amendment rights when they enter into a public school. People have the right to refer to themselves however they want to be referred to, and the school district and the state cannot interfere with that right.

Of course what the people who write and pass these types of laws don't consider is what happens to people, especially kids, who have gender-fluid given names (Pat, Gerry, Randy, Ronnie, Johnnie, Jo, etc.) or names that don't fit their gender (Carrol O'Connor, Marion Michael Morrison, Sue (or Sioux), Alice Cooper, Marie (Merry)), or names that don't fit any gender (Moon Unit, Dweezle, Shithead, Ducky, Thoroughlygood, etc)?

Lots of way to attack these laws, lawyers just need to get creative.

Pexas Teat's avatar

I've been in groups of kids recently with multiple Harpers, Averys, Baileys, etc and it's a total crapshoot in terms of gender ratios.

Wookiee Monster's avatar

If a parent needs a teacher to tell them their daughter has short hair, then they aren’t very observant parents.

The result, say the Democrats, “is not greater safety — it is more fear, more isolation, and less access to care for Idaho's most vulnerable young people.”

And that’s the point. If trans kids are so afraid they stay in the closet until they’re old enough to get the fuck out of Idaho, then these bigoted assholes can pretend that they don’t exist.

455 Rocket Cat's avatar

They’ll die. Sorry, just science statistics. Trans acceptance saves lives and improves their life quality. If people want them to suffer and die, that’s on us, not them, for failing to stop it. You know, twenty years ago, we had this exact conversation about gay acceptance.

Wookiee Monster's avatar

They consider that outcome acceptable, too.

FukuiSanYesOta's avatar

Why? Why do they fucking care so much?

Gender fluidity is real. It's medically solid. It is a thing that fucking happens.

These fucking wedge issues where they kick people when they're down is just so fucking Republican.

Seth knows what I'm talking about as well, because it's not just gender fluidity. It's anyone who isn't a boring cishet white male.

FUCK I hate these people

455 Rocket Cat's avatar

It’s not a party for them until a gay or trans person dies. Death “proves” their worldview.

Wookiee Monster's avatar

Because they’re Christians. And being a Christian in America today means rigid social conformity, especially when it comes to gender roles.

It has fuck all to do with helping the sick or the poor or anything Jesus actually talked about.

LyftControlledCities's avatar

This X 1,000,000.

I want to see the day when all the churches are closed.

bcb's avatar

Of course, Republicans also assure us that there's no such thing as trans kids, so clearly there's nothing to report and the bill has no effect.

>The bill is the scrawny brainchild of state Rep. Bruce Skaug

No, stop this language: there is no such thing as a "brainchild." If you are writing a bill and you decide you want to stop writing it, you can just stop. A bill (or anything else you write) is not a living person!

Wookiee Monster's avatar

I believe that Idaho state law requires that once a bill has been conceived in the mind of a legislator, it must be carried to completion.

Mildred Downey Broxon's avatar

Sure looks like it, from what they've spawned.

JustPixelz's avatar

WaPo: "Brendan Carr warned media outlets to correct course or lose their licenses, as Trump escalated attacks on the media over Iran war coverage."

Kim Jung Un smiles.