241 Comments
User's avatar
Stranger Than Friction's avatar

I'm so sorry, Dok. Thanks for bringing this matter to national attention. I guess Idaho kids are going to not know physical books as much as other children. Maybe all this attempted censorship will just hasten the demise of printed materials.

Expand full comment
AboveTheGrayFog's avatar

"Davidson also claimed the YA fiction novel Red Hood was “obscene”"

Would he have been more amenable to it if it had been called "White Hood" instead? We have questions!

Expand full comment
sadie holly's avatar

These people miss the obvious, they do not have to patronize these libraries they can just order their books at home.

If I had my way no one would be allowed to hang a thomas Kinkaide painting with light again. I don't want to see them.

No one would be allowed to hang a flag so it is sitting in Mud (my right wing neighbors used to do it, because they would hang their flag and leave it out in the rain until is was so wet the pole would bend and the flag would be in the mud. They used to criticize me for taking my flag in in bad weather and in for the night.

All lights would be green towards me when I am driving, I don't care if people have to wait longer.

no one would b e allowed to talk on the phone when I am riding a bus. I always think they are talking to me.

Expand full comment
simpledinosaur's avatar

I think that for them, "civil society" is a zero sum affair. Simply not patronizing the libraries wouldn't be sufficient for their purposes: a tiny amount of their tax monies is being used to fund the libraries, and they must think they should never have to "subsidize" anything that they don't fully agree with. It's such an obstinate perspective that it would be hard to keep a society going if that's the operative principle. You and I could object that we don't want to pay for any smidgeon of right-wing-tending books, and then we might have no libraries at all.

Expand full comment
sadie holly's avatar

They just have to make all the decisions. no other opinion is accepted.

control freaks.

Expand full comment
Zyxomma's avatar

Ta, Dok. I am so horrified that I may never set foot in Idaho again, despite my love for the landscape. Fucking fuckers. Meanwhile, "religious" leaders are the groomers.

Expand full comment
bluePNWcats's avatar

I'm so sick of these halfwit, trailer trash, banjo picking, cousin fucking, three toed having, farm animal violating mangy assholes thinking that they are the bosses of everyone. Books were my only respite as a weird, fat, lonely little girl. The only joy I had a lot of the time. The fact that these jackholes want to rob some other poor weird little misfits from having that is almost too much for me. This absolute assault on truth and decency and normality is really weighing on me right now. 🤬🫤😔

Expand full comment
Craig Nixon's avatar

Speaking of rightwing parents...Moms For Liberty's wonderful Tiffany Justice (a misnomer if ever there was one) started off the day by calling Levar Burton "a moron".

Golly, the Fuck Your Feelings ilk sure is a little sensitive...

https://twitter.com/CraigNi40397745/status/1748114694282326024

Expand full comment
bluePNWcats's avatar

Lavar Burton is a national treasure and those moms for libertines aren't fit to shine the bottom of his shoes. 🤬

Expand full comment
Craig Nixon's avatar

Big facts.

Expand full comment
tegrat's avatar

How does one promote gender dysphoria?

Expand full comment
bluePNWcats's avatar

Yeah, are they "grooming" kids to be cis het? Yes, why yes they are...

Expand full comment
Bettinala's avatar

By prohibiting discussion, education, diagnosis, and/or treatment of it.

Expand full comment
Caepan's avatar

"We're trans, not blands, get used to it!"

Expand full comment
Glennis Waterman's avatar

Just wondering - if it were to prevail against a legal challenge, wouldn't they have to prove that such materials are "harmful" to children? How would they do that? Are there any credible studies, research, or data that confirms that assertion?

Expand full comment
Tosca's avatar

Their feelings don't care about your facts.

Expand full comment
bluePNWcats's avatar

It would be a completely unworkable mess. But that's the whole point. Why only ban some books when you can just drive the library out and effectively ban access to all books?

Expand full comment
Kermit's avatar

These people are not moved by verifiable evidence; they respond only to prayer and imagined responses by Gawd, strategies developed by Republican think tanks, or direct bribes. Since they are incapable of introspection, they can only imagine that others superficially "think" and react as they do, hence the beliefs that one, scientists are all crooks and two, all judges that rule against them are leftwing judges.

Expand full comment
Runfastandwin's avatar

11-2 FFS

Expand full comment
Wookiee Monster's avatar

Brad little sounds too sensible to be an Idaho Republican. He must be a RINO.

Expand full comment
House of the Blue Lights's avatar

"the committee chair asked a House page to collect the library copy Davidson brought to the hearing, but then said, no, maybe not, since the page was a minor. "

So a minor can't even /touch/ a disapproved book?

Expand full comment
bluePNWcats's avatar

Perversion by osmosis 🙄

Expand full comment
Peter MacMonagle's avatar

Close the libraries and the schools. Send everyone home and make the parents solely responsible for their kids' learning, reading, and whatever. Who needs schools when you can just have the kids trucked out to the farms and have them pick crops. No need for daycare either. What could go wrong?

Expand full comment
Craig Nixon's avatar

I'm an asshole and I approve this message.

Expand full comment
fair_n_hite_451's avatar

PARENT'SRIGHTS to make choices for their own children seems like a concept lost on these Karen's.

Expand full comment
Easterncedar's avatar

Jaron Crane of Nampa?

Sci-fi porn name for sure.

Expand full comment
Lionel “8647” Hutz's avatar

But what of all the little minds that were twisted when they were groomed with "Hop on Pop."

Won't someone think of the children!!!

Expand full comment
Luke Warm's avatar

I am a librarian in Georgia. We got a notice that several libraries around the state have been contacted by Orwellian “first amendment auditors” who wish to come with video cameras and accuse us of being groomers.

Expand full comment
Wookiee Monster's avatar

Tell them that unless they’re there to actually use the library’s resources, they can fuck off or be arrested for trespassing.

Expand full comment
Luke Warm's avatar

I wish I could but a confrontation is exactly what they are looking for. The best course of action is to calmly explain the libraries policy on filming.

Expand full comment
fair_n_hite_451's avatar

Privacy laws might apply here. Can't just show up and start filming people without consent.

Expand full comment
msnomer's avatar

If they're in public, you absolutely can.

Expand full comment
fair_n_hite_451's avatar

Can I come to your office and just start filming you? Not sure why a librarian should receive any less protection because they happen to work in a library.

Expand full comment
msnomer's avatar

My office is not public, hon. Public libraries are.

As long as you are in a public space, you can be filmed without consent.

This is a good thing, because it means you can film cops.

Expand full comment
Gammarae's avatar

first move: "NO."

second move: put all your grannies out front. aunt bee looks nice but she won't take any crap.

Expand full comment