This is the second stupidest graf in the piece, for sure. And it's right there, for fuck's sake. "It is an outrageous infringement on the rights of parents ... from homes where no one is paying attention."
That last paragraph is some Palin-class upfuckedness. "I think schools should be prohibited from handing out contraception, even though I agree that it prevents unplanned pregnancies, which I also agree are 'worse'."
i do not really understand any of this so i will merely repeat myself:
the only reason to read the new york post is for page 6.
Issindaconsichooshun!
Oh, for fuck's sake.
This Texas Congressfuck certainly has a bizzaro-world understanding of the meaning of the word "patriot".
This is the second stupidest graf in the piece, for sure. And it's right there, for fuck's sake. "It is an outrageous infringement on the rights of parents ... from homes where no one is paying attention."
Fucking hipsters.
That last paragraph is some Palin-class upfuckedness. "I think schools should be prohibited from handing out contraception, even though I agree that it prevents unplanned pregnancies, which I also agree are 'worse'."
The fuck?
I think "hand outs" just got him started, ya know.
â«
Easy for you to say.
I keep reading it as IVF, and wondering where the snowflake babbies fit into the narrative.
Popette Editrix I.
All of me comes after slatterns. Wait.
<a href="http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=4pXfHLUlZf4" target="_blank"> Is this an example of pre-intercourse contraception?</a>
So if these teenaged grrrls engaged in sex for money would that make it more acceptable, &#039;free hand of the market&#039;?
But only after the old geezers hanging around the outskirts of town say it&#039;s OK.
Probably depends on whether they incorporate.