27 Comments

i do not really understand any of this so i will merely repeat myself:

the only reason to read the new york post is for page 6.

Expand full comment

Issindaconsichooshun!

Expand full comment

Oh, for fuck's sake.

This Texas Congressfuck certainly has a bizzaro-world understanding of the meaning of the word "patriot".

Expand full comment

This is the second stupidest graf in the piece, for sure. And it's right there, for fuck's sake. "It is an outrageous infringement on the rights of parents ... from homes where no one is paying attention."

Expand full comment

Fucking hipsters.

Expand full comment

That last paragraph is some Palin-class upfuckedness. "I think schools should be prohibited from handing out contraception, even though I agree that it prevents unplanned pregnancies, which I also agree are 'worse'."

The fuck?

Expand full comment

I think "hand outs" just got him started, ya know.

Expand full comment

♫

Expand full comment

Easy for you to say.

Expand full comment

I keep reading it as IVF, and wondering where the snowflake babbies fit into the narrative.

Expand full comment

Popette Editrix I.

Expand full comment

All of me comes after slatterns. Wait.

Expand full comment

<a href="http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=4pXfHLUlZf4" target="_blank"> Is this an example of pre-intercourse contraception?</a>

Expand full comment

So if these teenaged grrrls engaged in sex for money would that make it more acceptable, 'free hand of the market'?

Expand full comment

But only after the old geezers hanging around the outskirts of town say it's OK.

Expand full comment

Probably depends on whether they incorporate.

Expand full comment