8 Comments

Surely by now they realize the whole "we have an airtight case case so you'd better confess and get a lesser charge" thing is flawed. First, if the cops were really that sure of their case, they wouldn't need to pressure the suspect for a confesson. Suspects should realize they are being played. Second, if someone is innocent but the cops tell them they have all this evidence and prison is a sure thing, wouldn't a rational person take the deal whether they were guilty or not, just to avoid the (fictional) guaranteed harsher sentence they think a trial would bring? False confessions seem to be rampant.

Expand full comment

<blockquote>a “lying is OK, but too much lying is not OK” standard</blockquote>

Explains a lot about the financial elites, corporate marketing and Congress too...

Expand full comment

There's something I'd like to confess to Sharon Stone.

Expand full comment

It's worth repeating: a certain percentile of law enforcement officers are nothing more than gym teachers issued a weapon and the authority to use deadly force.

Expand full comment

In conclusion, I don't care WHAT those idiots on Law&Order do, DON'T FOR FUCKSAKES TALK TO THE COPS WITHOUT YOUR LAWYER. That always pisses me off.

Expand full comment

Tasers also, too.

Expand full comment

Meanwhile, our own PA Supremes ruled recently that cops do need no stinking warrant to search your vehicle, as long as the cop has a really solid hunch. Look for the Roberts court to sort this all out on the prosecution's side next year.

Expand full comment

<i> fucking Goldilocks</i>

Challenge accepted.

Expand full comment