12 Comments
User's avatar
SullivanSt's avatar

Nope, gotta watch Ow, My Balls.

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

It's really quite simple: Under the new, improved Billionaire's First Amendment, Jack gets freedom <i>of</i> speech (his), and freedom <i>from</i> speech (yours). And no, you don't get to criticize the new rules -- that's what they're for.

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Imagine a country where people complained about the money being spent on health, education and welfare. Surely that would be intolerable.

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

<a href="http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=TYpYs9GBXwY" target="_blank">You said it... </a>

Gherkins d'Resistance's avatar

Jack Welch, it's called Freedom of Speech.

Not Freedom of Screech.

Perhaps they taught you wrong in your American Historionics classes?

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

<i>"Imagine a country where the major corporations weren't rewarded for offshoring jobs and the CEO's of such corporations believed in creating a livable wage for it's employees."</i>

A long, long time ago, in a galaxy far, far ... wait, <a href="http:\/\/corporate.ford.com\/news-center\/press-releases-detail\/677-5-dollar-a-day" target="_blank">it wasn't far away at all. </a>

Lot_49's avatar

we should totally make it illegal for people to criticize the <strike>insane</strike> rich, for freedom.

//fixed

SullivanSt's avatar

Is it just me, or is it starting to look like <em>Idiocracy</em> vastly understated the problem?

fuflans's avatar

if barack obama is so damned good at manipulating numbers why hasn't he done something about this poll data?

PsycWench's avatar

Funny how many people interpret "freedom of speech" as "freedom from criticism".

Joshua Norton's avatar

Wingnut Guide to the Constitution 101.

Free speech for me but not for thee.