James Comey Long ago and far away in an America that was not yet made great again, a lady named Hillary Clinton barely escaped living out the rest of her days in solitary because of #EMAILS. But yea, though she didst have a criminal black heart, it was determined
"Not I. I think *something* will be found, and it may well be serious enough to merit impeachment proceedings. In addition, there may well be Federal and/or State charges filed against the President and some senior members of his staff. But I'm making no claims about what those charges may be or against whom they may be filed."
And even granting that NO Americans or Trump advisers did work with Russia to knowingly interfere with the campaign (a mighty big grant, but I'll stretch that far for the sake of argument) most of his advisers, officials and close family too, are up to their ears in crooked real estate deals involving Russian mobsters, massive money laundering involving Russian mobsters, shonky oil manipulations involving Russian oligarchs and/or Middle Eastern monarchs who bust a gut laughing when human rights are mentioned, and highly doubtful loans from the world's most crooked banks which also handle vast sums in filthy Russian mobster money, all of which according to the Republican Party amounts to, "Nothing to see here, close it down and jail the Clintons."Crikey, if Mueller and his team can sort out this spaghetti tangle of ratfuckery and crime in under three years, I dip my lid to them, because they ... are ... extremely ... good!
Really? I mean, usually Breitbarty alt-right types like yourself pretend to have principles, but you are openly saying the ends justify the means here.
Tell me, in real life do you consider people responding to you to be a sign you've triggered them?Do you ever actually discuss things with people or do you just assume butthurt when anyone holds a different opinion from you?
Me? I was pointing out the irony of both parties convicting the other ....when?? BEFORE the "real evidence comes out".
You and I would actually agree if you weren't using your argument to suggest guilt BEFORE the "real evidence comes out".
I am not the one claiming its a foregone conclusion. I am not the one "jumping the gun". You guys are the ones claiming the investigation is a huge snowball of mounting evidence, indictments, people "rolling over" and complete obviousness. Its not though.
I'm all for waiting for the "real evidence" but after a year and half Trump is being called "not a target".
So keep on chanting and telling yourselves you aren't like the other team.
Once again, the Trumpians are for locking people up without evidence or due process.
When we go back to talking about Trump Russia they will be against it.
Why? Because you can't?
I am really curious to know what you think triggering is and whether you've triggered people here.
As in "The Ministry of ... "
Just so you understand, reread and absorb:
"Not I. I think *something* will be found, and it may well be serious enough to merit impeachment proceedings. In addition, there may well be Federal and/or State charges filed against the President and some senior members of his staff. But I'm making no claims about what those charges may be or against whom they may be filed."
And even granting that NO Americans or Trump advisers did work with Russia to knowingly interfere with the campaign (a mighty big grant, but I'll stretch that far for the sake of argument) most of his advisers, officials and close family too, are up to their ears in crooked real estate deals involving Russian mobsters, massive money laundering involving Russian mobsters, shonky oil manipulations involving Russian oligarchs and/or Middle Eastern monarchs who bust a gut laughing when human rights are mentioned, and highly doubtful loans from the world's most crooked banks which also handle vast sums in filthy Russian mobster money, all of which according to the Republican Party amounts to, "Nothing to see here, close it down and jail the Clintons."Crikey, if Mueller and his team can sort out this spaghetti tangle of ratfuckery and crime in under three years, I dip my lid to them, because they ... are ... extremely ... good!
I don't think you understand what triggering is.
Interesting. Obviously I don't agree with you, but it is interesting to see how you read anything to bolster your ego.
That's not what triggering means.
Really? I mean, usually Breitbarty alt-right types like yourself pretend to have principles, but you are openly saying the ends justify the means here.
Not a big fan of free speech then, I see.
Tell me, in real life do you consider people responding to you to be a sign you've triggered them?Do you ever actually discuss things with people or do you just assume butthurt when anyone holds a different opinion from you?
Me? I was pointing out the irony of both parties convicting the other ....when?? BEFORE the "real evidence comes out".
You and I would actually agree if you weren't using your argument to suggest guilt BEFORE the "real evidence comes out".
I am not the one claiming its a foregone conclusion. I am not the one "jumping the gun". You guys are the ones claiming the investigation is a huge snowball of mounting evidence, indictments, people "rolling over" and complete obviousness. Its not though.
I'm all for waiting for the "real evidence" but after a year and half Trump is being called "not a target".
So keep on chanting and telling yourselves you aren't like the other team.
Little Donald's official response to the memos: https://youtu.be/q1pMmgMQM84
hoc est dicere troglodytam flebilis
ah I don't think so - that would need more self awareness than this one shows.