When yr Wonkette has an idea that doesn't pan out because a little thought or even some research reveals a fatal flaw in the premise, we spike the idea (or Editrix or Dok does it for us, coldly, like we've been bad, the way we like it.) The National Review does things differently, we guess.
Comes in handy when Junior mangles his arm in the thresher, and there's no workers' comp because "family farm, no laws, tough shit" is a GOP family value.
Colon cancer could set him back about $100,000 at retail. I wonder if he'll play the odds and get a colonoscopy ($10,000 retail). Free markets, fuck yeah!
<i>Obamacare requires insurance companies to spend between 80-85% of their revenue on coverage</i>
I already got a $140 rebate this year from those fucks at Oxford because they did not meet the minimum. This is what terrifies the GOP: people will start actually using Obamacare and then it will be game over. Sorry Jonah; go suck a whale.
I like in the Forbes&#039; piece updates where, after complaining about California comparing apples-to-oranges, they go ahead and compare the <em>family</em> out-of-pocket maximum under Covered California against the <em>individual</em> out-of-pocket maximum under a current-day plan. Oops, wrong.
The eHealthInsurance plans that Forbes uses as a benchmark don&#039;t cover: labs, ER visits, prescriptions, chiropody, maternal care, OB/GYN, checkups, or baby well-visits. At all. Oh dear. Forbes seem to be comparing apples to date palms.
No, you are wrong Wonkette. Obamacare isn&#039;t people buying health insurance from private companies, it is people being forced at gunpoint into long lines to see government bureaucrats and being put on a waiting list to see a government doctor after private property is outlawed.
Comes in handy when Junior mangles his arm in the thresher, and there&#039;s no workers&#039; comp because &quot;family farm, no laws, tough shit&quot; is a GOP family value.
And buy it drinks!
Business up top, party down below.
but don&#039;tcha know? You libtards are the real Nazis because- socialist
How can you argue with that bit of blazing logic and critical thinking?
telling the rubes what they want to hear has always been profitable
it&#039;s like a Chinese finger trap when Jonah sticks his fingers in his ears
He&#039;s got a big... heart.
<i>&quot;something we also must assume Jonah Goldberg knows&quot;</i>
Ahahahahaha . . . you do realize you went totally off the rails there, right?
Or a bottomless void, into which facts and concepts vanish without a trace.
Can you really do that with votes?
When is the cage match with Jim Hoft, for the Stupidest Man on the Internet trophy?
Colon cancer could set him back about $100,000 at retail. I wonder if he&#039;ll play the odds and get a colonoscopy ($10,000 retail). Free markets, fuck yeah!
<i>Obamacare requires insurance companies to spend between 80-85% of their revenue on coverage</i>
I already got a $140 rebate this year from those fucks at Oxford because they did not meet the minimum. This is what terrifies the GOP: people will start actually using Obamacare and then it will be game over. Sorry Jonah; go suck a whale.
I like in the Forbes&#039; piece updates where, after complaining about California comparing apples-to-oranges, they go ahead and compare the <em>family</em> out-of-pocket maximum under Covered California against the <em>individual</em> out-of-pocket maximum under a current-day plan. Oops, wrong.
The eHealthInsurance plans that Forbes uses as a benchmark don&#039;t cover: labs, ER visits, prescriptions, chiropody, maternal care, OB/GYN, checkups, or baby well-visits. At all. Oh dear. Forbes seem to be comparing apples to date palms.
No, you are wrong Wonkette. Obamacare isn&#039;t people buying health insurance from private companies, it is people being forced at gunpoint into long lines to see government bureaucrats and being put on a waiting list to see a government doctor after private property is outlawed.
Your chance to <em>get orffa Jonah&#039;s lawn</em>?