Joseph Farah, the editor of Serious News Outlet WorldNet Daily, has a Serious Question he wishes you to consider: “Are we better off now than we were in 1776?” And while the real answer involves glancing at the illustration above, remembering that women couldn't vote until 1919, rolling our eyes, and saying "Duh, Joe," we are pretty sure that we would not get paid for this blog post if we didn't engage Farah's dumb column in further detail.
There is more to the story. Something like this...<br /><br /><br />Connecticut was settled in the 1600s by people who were disaffected by the religious purity of the Massachusetts colony. Eventually they made \"Presbyterians only\" or somesuch part of their charter and constitution. Around the time of the Revolution and our God-given First Amendment, they said \"Non-Prebyterians are ok, but no Catholics or Jews\". For some reason, Mooslems weren&#039;t mentioned -- I guess they were OK with Sharia Law back then.
Well, I&#039;m a white male (though a filthy Irish Papist by birth), but of the homosexualist variety, so I think I&#039;ll stay in 2013 with its prodigious amounts of gay porn and go-go boys, thank you. I just wouldn&#039;t be cut out for the British Navy; I get seasick and don&#039;t like rum.
&quot;the Judeo-Christian, biblical form [of religion] that inspired the concept of self-government, the rights of the individual and the rule of law&quot;
You don&#039;t think Joe&#039;s Lord and Saviour would&#039;ve protected him? It seems pretty clear that the righteous people throughout good ol&#039; Amercian history have been preserved, and that misfortune only falls upon those who aren&#039;t slavishly obeying G_d with sufficient fervor.
Getting paid to lie would be an easy gig. Hmmmm.
AOT,BL.
I&#039;m kinda late to the party, but ..
Jews were banned from living and worshiping in Connecticut until 1840.
Those were the two things I wouldn&#039;t mind so much! It&#039;s the rum part I couldn&#039;t handle.
There is more to the story. Something like this...<br /><br /><br />Connecticut was settled in the 1600s by people who were disaffected by the religious purity of the Massachusetts colony. Eventually they made \"Presbyterians only\" or somesuch part of their charter and constitution. Around the time of the Revolution and our God-given First Amendment, they said \"Non-Prebyterians are ok, but no Catholics or Jews\". For some reason, Mooslems weren&#039;t mentioned -- I guess they were OK with Sharia Law back then.
Well, I&#039;m a white male (though a filthy Irish Papist by birth), but of the homosexualist variety, so I think I&#039;ll stay in 2013 with its prodigious amounts of gay porn and go-go boys, thank you. I just wouldn&#039;t be cut out for the British Navy; I get seasick and don&#039;t like rum.
Dammit, I meant to type &quot;media-controlled state.&quot;
As for denigrating honest American farts, I don&#039;t see how we can excuse his treachery by blaming mere incompetence.
ask the Haitians
Is it the fourth or fitfh &quot;derp&quot; than signifies &quot;Obama is BLAH!!!!&quot; ?
Freedom&#039;s just another word for nothing left to lose...
his hands were HUGE. He could hit rapid fire tenths without having to cheat to the edge of the keys
&quot;the Judeo-Christian, biblical form [of religion] that inspired the concept of self-government, the rights of the individual and the rule of law&quot;
WTF?????????
Pessimist.
You don&#039;t think Joe&#039;s Lord and Saviour would&#039;ve protected him? It seems pretty clear that the righteous people throughout good ol&#039; Amercian history have been preserved, and that misfortune only falls upon those who aren&#039;t slavishly obeying G_d with sufficient fervor.
they don&#039;t stack as well that way
damn outsourcing...
Unquenchable jealousy.