Alabama's Roy Moore is very worried. His state has had the gay forcibly crammed down its throat , and as much as he's tried to swallow, he just can't , you guys, he CANNOT . [contextly_sidebar id="kS3ZFQ51fCpGFSWzIl708VA5QY4ktYuv"] And it is not just about the gays anymore, there is a greater threat looming, one that could throw a whole new daisy chain into the gears of Christian marriage, and
"...When two bisexuals or two transgendered marry, how large is that family? Can they marry two persons, one of the same sex and one of the opposite sex? Then, you’ve got a family of four or how many?”
Well, it depends. In order to make the equations simpler, and because two appears to be the maximum size allowed in Moore's definition of "family," let's assume there are no children when making our calculations:Scientifically, when two bisexuals marry, that's still two people, although it does double the opportunities to be lustful in one's heart, although I don't know if that factors into Moore's concerns vis-à-vis family size. When two "transgendered" marry, however, that could be anywhere from two to four people, depending on whether neither, one, or both have completely transgenderized (transgenderified? transgenderated?), you know, like, surgically or whatever. Each transgendered might be one person (i.e., the preoperative "original" person) or two people (i.e., the original biological person and the new, transgendinatified person that corresponds to their gender identity). Similarly (although Moore doesn't propose this scenario), if a transgendered and a bisexual were to marry it could be either two or three people. It's all very complicated, and as a scientist, I wouldn't expect a judge who defied a federal court order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from public property to understand. In any event, Moore should be less concerned with how many people are in a two-person marriage and more concerned with the greater threat that gay marriage presents to his state: Namely, that if a few of those couples get gay divorced, it could push traditional-definition pre-gay-marriage Alabama from the second-highest rate of divorce in the U.S. all the way to number-one most divorciest in all the land.
That is the freakiest freak-flag hiding freakster face I have ever seen. Methinks the freaky, freaky freak doth protest too much.
I think you have to be a bi-sexual trans-sexual. Or is that a song from Rocky Horror?
More Wankaholic than Wonkaholic.
Or that straight people seek only monogamous marriages? Polygamy, anyone?
Wait, wut? Have you seen the nincompoops that make up the AZ legislature? I don't want those hyper partisan dimwits anywhere appointing judges.
*groan* I feel a little bad about kinda giggling at that. A little.
If Alabama lets a man marry two women, then it must let a man marry two men. Or a woman and a man. Or a man and a woman.
Look, freedom isn't always pretty.
Throat, yes. Hot iron bars not so much.
Maybe "uphold," there, means something more like "hold up" (interfere with, obfuscate, minimize). He does look sorta shifty.
To be pedantic, bi-weekly means "every two weeks". "Twice per week" is semi-weekly. Now we need to know, what would semi-sexual be?
"...When two bisexuals or two transgendered marry, how large is that family? Can they marry two persons, one of the same sex and one of the opposite sex? Then, you’ve got a family of four or how many?”
Well, it depends. In order to make the equations simpler, and because two appears to be the maximum size allowed in Moore's definition of "family," let's assume there are no children when making our calculations:Scientifically, when two bisexuals marry, that's still two people, although it does double the opportunities to be lustful in one's heart, although I don't know if that factors into Moore's concerns vis-à-vis family size. When two "transgendered" marry, however, that could be anywhere from two to four people, depending on whether neither, one, or both have completely transgenderized (transgenderified? transgenderated?), you know, like, surgically or whatever. Each transgendered might be one person (i.e., the preoperative "original" person) or two people (i.e., the original biological person and the new, transgendinatified person that corresponds to their gender identity). Similarly (although Moore doesn't propose this scenario), if a transgendered and a bisexual were to marry it could be either two or three people. It's all very complicated, and as a scientist, I wouldn't expect a judge who defied a federal court order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from public property to understand. In any event, Moore should be less concerned with how many people are in a two-person marriage and more concerned with the greater threat that gay marriage presents to his state: Namely, that if a few of those couples get gay divorced, it could push traditional-definition pre-gay-marriage Alabama from the second-highest rate of divorce in the U.S. all the way to number-one most divorciest in all the land.
Now we need to know, what would semi-sexual be?
Married.
HEY-OHH!
Yeah, is it larger than the Duggars' family? How many is too many when your reality show is up for another season?
Hair plugs? I think he sticks his entire head up there.
HEEEY-OOHH! Damn, I laughed!
That's literally the craziest thing I've ever read.