260 Comments
User's avatar
FlownOver, Unraptured's avatar

Alleged testicles, if you please.

Barry_D's avatar

The problem is that he is right. The law does not apply to him.

conti ben's avatar

"It would be weaponized against poor and BIPOC people in a heartbeat."

Poor and BIPOC people don't have the courtesy of being issued subpoenas...Those are for rich white white-collar criminals...Poor and BIPOC people are either arrested or shot on sight...

Zap's avatar

Flock of Gerbils.

Christian Connor's avatar

saying Ernesto Herrera was a terrifying strange man yelling unintelligibly ... well, Paxton comes off as a tad racist.

John Lupien's avatar

Maybe this known criminal defendant wanted another notch on his belt?

John Lupien's avatar

It says misdemeanor, does that mean "ugly face"?

Pexas Teat's avatar

I figure someone with his pedigree in fraud and securities violations ought to know a process server just from past experience.

gingerwentworth's avatar

Good idea, and it would work, too. ps I do think process servers could easily get shot. Do they? Btw, here's a very non-manly man-- shouldn't he be featured on Tucker C's show? He should be made to explain why not. For whatever the reason, do manly men run a way and duck? And tell ten thousand lies in a row about how scared they are?

RMS's avatar

"necessitated"? how about 'required?' Even 'made necessary' would be better

Boojum's avatar

Money and greed, mostly, with a soupçon of bigotry.

Boojum's avatar

It does make proof of service easier.

ScrwUStillaTexanLibrul's avatar

AOT,K. He's been under felony indictment for white collar crime for 7 years.

feckless's avatar

Process servers in TX should refuse to do business with an AG that advocates shooting people who are breaking no laws.

Dear media: please ask the AG if defendants have a right to shoot process servers that he deploys?