260 Comments
User's avatar
FlownOver, Unraptured's avatar

Attorney Inmate #54736

Expand full comment
FlownOver, Unraptured's avatar

Alleged testicles, if you please.

Expand full comment
Barry_D's avatar

The problem is that he is right. The law does not apply to him.

Expand full comment
conti ben's avatar

"It would be weaponized against poor and BIPOC people in a heartbeat."

Poor and BIPOC people don't have the courtesy of being issued subpoenas...Those are for rich white white-collar criminals...Poor and BIPOC people are either arrested or shot on sight...

Expand full comment
Zap's avatar

Flock of Gerbils.

Expand full comment
Christian Connor's avatar

saying Ernesto Herrera was a terrifying strange man yelling unintelligibly ... well, Paxton comes off as a tad racist.

Expand full comment
John Lupien's avatar

This seems relevant: https://codes.findlaw.com/t....

Expand full comment
John Lupien's avatar

Maybe this known criminal defendant wanted another notch on his belt?

Expand full comment
John Lupien's avatar

It says misdemeanor, does that mean "ugly face"?

Expand full comment
Pexas Teat's avatar

I figure someone with his pedigree in fraud and securities violations ought to know a process server just from past experience.

Expand full comment
gingerwentworth's avatar

Good idea, and it would work, too. ps I do think process servers could easily get shot. Do they? Btw, here's a very non-manly man-- shouldn't he be featured on Tucker C's show? He should be made to explain why not. For whatever the reason, do manly men run a way and duck? And tell ten thousand lies in a row about how scared they are?

Expand full comment
RMS's avatar

"necessitated"? how about 'required?' Even 'made necessary' would be better

Expand full comment
Boojum's avatar

Money and greed, mostly, with a soupçon of bigotry.

Expand full comment
Boojum's avatar

It does make proof of service easier.

Expand full comment
ScrwUStillaTexanLibrul's avatar

AOT,K. He's been under felony indictment for white collar crime for 7 years.

Expand full comment
feckless's avatar

Process servers in TX should refuse to do business with an AG that advocates shooting people who are breaking no laws.

Dear media: please ask the AG if defendants have a right to shoot process servers that he deploys?

Expand full comment