260 Comments

Attorney Inmate #54736

Expand full comment

Alleged testicles, if you please.

Expand full comment

The problem is that he is right. The law does not apply to him.

Expand full comment

"It would be weaponized against poor and BIPOC people in a heartbeat."

Poor and BIPOC people don't have the courtesy of being issued subpoenas...Those are for rich white white-collar criminals...Poor and BIPOC people are either arrested or shot on sight...

Expand full comment

Flock of Gerbils.

Expand full comment

saying Ernesto Herrera was a terrifying strange man yelling unintelligibly ... well, Paxton comes off as a tad racist.

Expand full comment

This seems relevant: https://codes.findlaw.com/t....

Expand full comment

Maybe this known criminal defendant wanted another notch on his belt?

Expand full comment

It says misdemeanor, does that mean "ugly face"?

Expand full comment

I figure someone with his pedigree in fraud and securities violations ought to know a process server just from past experience.

Expand full comment

Good idea, and it would work, too. ps I do think process servers could easily get shot. Do they? Btw, here's a very non-manly man-- shouldn't he be featured on Tucker C's show? He should be made to explain why not. For whatever the reason, do manly men run a way and duck? And tell ten thousand lies in a row about how scared they are?

Expand full comment

"necessitated"? how about 'required?' Even 'made necessary' would be better

Expand full comment

Money and greed, mostly, with a soupçon of bigotry.

Expand full comment

It does make proof of service easier.

Expand full comment

AOT,K. He's been under felony indictment for white collar crime for 7 years.

Expand full comment

Process servers in TX should refuse to do business with an AG that advocates shooting people who are breaking no laws.

Dear media: please ask the AG if defendants have a right to shoot process servers that he deploys?

Expand full comment