Earlier this week, we brought you the Happy Funtimes Leagle Beagle News that open suer Larry Klayman, famous in the olden days for subpoenaing Bill Clinton's penis like three times a day (and also Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force records, because "nonpartisan" or something) and famous recently for representing twin Lights Bradlee Dean and Sheriff Joe Arpaio, had filed a $1.4 million lawsuit against Village Voice Media, CityPages, the Phoenix New Times, and pretty much everyone who wasn't Your Wonket, for saying he might have touched his children in their swimsuit area.
If the rest of the complaint is as poorly written as these excerpts, I'm going to have to wonder if perhaps English is not Larry Klayman's native language. That perhaps he too is an illegal immigrant. And likely a radical transgender lesbian, too. At least, all the evidence is pointing in that direction.
This seems entirely unfair to unfrozen caveman lawyer, who may be thousands of years behind the times but is still more coherent and effective than Klayman.
Is he trying to claim that he is not guilty of molesting two children, since he only molested one? Also what is this entity described variously as VMG and VMH?
"I am negligently-willfully-maliciously-falsely-misleadingly accused of committing and/or being convicted of molesting two kids."
Funny how that whole yammering word-salad of obfuscation falls short of stating that he did not molest the kid. Between that and taking the Fifth, Klayman is painting a richly-detailed picture -- with a distinctly child-abuse-shaped blank space right in the middle of it.
You know, I regularly forget that she's a lawyer. Now if I could only forget the rest.
Torah! Torah! Torah!
Not on the Supremes.
any screen grab that begins with:
<i>children&#039;s private parts</i>
just can&#039;t end well.
I get pruney in the bathtub.
If the rest of the complaint is as poorly written as these excerpts, I&#039;m going to have to wonder if perhaps English is not Larry Klayman&#039;s native language. That perhaps he too is an illegal immigrant. And likely a radical transgender lesbian, too. At least, all the evidence is pointing in that direction.
This seems entirely unfair to unfrozen caveman lawyer, who may be thousands of years behind the times but is still more coherent and effective than Klayman.
Is he trying to claim that he is not guilty of molesting two children, since he only molested one? Also what is this entity described variously as VMG and VMH?
Wonkette is in the same sentence as an Ultra-leftist atheist public interest group. I believe congratulations are in order.
Aren&#039;t you up kind of early Ms Edtrix?
I always wondered why Jew-dicial Watch was so damned important.
&quot;Proliferating daily&quot;? That sounds exhausting.
&quot;I am negligently-willfully-maliciously-falsely-misleadingly accused of committing and/or being convicted of molesting two kids.&quot;
Funny how that whole yammering word-salad of obfuscation falls short of stating that he did not molest the kid. Between that and taking the Fifth, Klayman is painting a richly-detailed picture -- with a distinctly child-abuse-shaped blank space right in the middle of it.