Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert Barron's avatar

I am suffering to see Suckabee suffer. We Are the World when it comes to the malnourished. I have heard so many tales about the Second Amendment, but I think I read one of the most illuminating recitations about the amendment recently, and it is found in the Economist. A corpus was developed, independent of the Economist, in which certain words and phrases in certain periods could be pinpointed for meaning. Of particular interest in the Second Amendment is the phrase "right to bear arms." It was found, in referring to the corpus, that when the amendment was authored, the phrase "right to bear arms" was used in connection with the maintenance of militias almost exclusively, and did not confer on individuals the right to own armaments. Scalia, in an opinion relevant to the Second Amendment, claimed that we must understand the original language used at the time the document was authored, but he conveniently used current day meaning without referring back to the time period in which the Second Amendment was authored. He was as much of an apostate as those he accused of viewing the Constitution as a living document. He was no more a strict constructionist than any other babba who claims to have some insight into the strict meaning of the Constitution.

Expand full comment
Darth Trad's avatar

TAKE THE GUNS OFF THE CRAZY PEOPLE!

That can't be that hard? What is wrong with you people?

Expand full comment
303 more comments...

No posts