318 Comments
User's avatar
Haruko Haruhara's avatar

Is Matt still carrying water for anti-semite Elon Musk?

Expand full comment
Tecolote's avatar

Democrats who sit on a House Committee meeting that is chaired by Gym Jordan should always slip in a mention about how Jordan lost the vote to be Speaker. Repeat it, often, for the good of the country.

Expand full comment
1st light's avatar

Always mention the subpoena he ignored.

Expand full comment
Just_Jim's avatar

I'd rather they slipped in a mention about failing to report sexual abuse committed on his wrestlers.

Expand full comment
MrPug's avatar

In addition to that the Democrats should remind everyone that he has ignored a Congressional subpoena for over 500 days.

Expand full comment
2Cats2Furious's avatar

But Jordan only lost the vote 3 times before the House GQP picked a different candidate! Not like the 14 unsuccessful votes that loser Kevin McCarthy had before finally becoming Squeaker.

Expand full comment
Colbert Thorenson's avatar

Factual and intellectual dishonesty are the lifeblood of fascist movements. Even though these hearings wont change anything because none of it implicates constitutional free speech, they still serve the critical purpose of further sealing off the truth from their fervent base.

Expand full comment
Lefty Wright's avatar

So the gist of the idiots promoting a wild west of disinformation is that blatant lies and misinformation that is dangerous to the public should not be censored. But then go even further by saying any attempt to expose those lies or inform the public of the dangers of those lies is a violation of free speech rights. So you have the right to lie about me but I should not have the right to dispute or correct your lies on the platform you are using.

Expand full comment
Bagels of Doom's avatar

god, this is dumb.

Expand full comment
Trump University Graduate's avatar

Seems like the Glibertarians behind all of this nonsense that "social media platforms are the town square and therefore free speech should not be censored there" lose sight of the fact that "town squares" like Fox News get to exercise editorial discretion with regard to their content. Wouldn't it be nice then if these Glibertarians would get behind legislation to bring back the "fairness doctrine" that used to require media outlets to offer equal time to opposing views? Nevah Haji Baba.

Expand full comment
Zap's avatar

Yeah it would be nice if Faux had any ethics whatsoever. On the other hand inappropriate both-siderism is partly to blame for letting PAB get away with just about anything he wants.

Expand full comment
Trump University Graduate's avatar

Here's this Ms. Subramanya warning about how the gubmint in Canada took offense at a bunch of assholes who tried to shut the economy down with their trucker strike. Weird shit is happening in Canada. Read about it in Naomi Klein's new book "Doppelganger." She tells about walking the riding in Canada where her husband was running for parliament as an NDPer. She describes encountering too many people who presented themselves as members of what once was the "counter-culture" in BC, who she and her husband's campaign people thought were reliable NDP voters. Instead, they found that those voters had suddenly switched to being inclined to vote for the ultra right wing party known as the "People's Party" who gave as their reason for doing so being tired of the failed promises of the NDP and the Liberal Party. Instead of transitioning from the left to the right by maybe first voting for the Liberals and then the Conservatives, these folk jumped instantly to the Canadian equivalent of Trumpers. Similarly, when a group of truckers attempted to express solidarity with the Indigenous People of Canada when the horrors of the residential school deaths were revealed by holding truckers' strikes, the right wing truckers completely co-opted and shanghaied those protests by even bigger truckers' strikes aimed at the Canadian government's Covid restrictions. Apparently, Ms. Subramanya wants to surreptitiously support those protests with her testimony before Congress. While she may be attempting to justify herself by taking issue with the Canadian government's investigations into the co-opting truckers, she gives those truckers succor with this testimony.

Expand full comment
Oy!'s avatar

Wow, Rep. Cammack is really a POS. Ugh.

Expand full comment
Trux Mint In Box's avatar

Matt Taibbi is the bad reporter in every detective show that thinks he’s above it all, throws away their ethics for a taste of power and eventually gets his comeuppance. And when that happens people will celebrate and these same Republicans that are using him will stop answering their phones.

Expand full comment
42tontom's avatar

Idon’tknowhim.gif

Expand full comment
ResistanceFictionistaBlondeIQ's avatar

He's the Geraldo Rivera of Trent Crimms.

Expand full comment
DJ Teetop's avatar

It's a fine line between the tankie nutosphere and the right wing bubble

Expand full comment
Satanic Pancake's avatar

Oh, just fuck all the way off, Bishop.

Expand full comment
Trux Mint In Box's avatar

NYT -

Musk’s Warning to Advertisers, and Other Summit Highlights

Is that what that temper tantrum horrible business decision was? A warning?

Expand full comment
Zap's avatar

Yes. Warning advertisers is sure to bring them back.

Expand full comment
Wookiee Monster's avatar

Muskrat has given up trying to make Xitter work as a business and is trying to blame the inevitable implosion on the advertisers who don’t love free speech as much as he does.

Expand full comment
Wokey McWokeface's avatar

The captain is determined not to go down with the ship. And we'll never find out what the advertisers did with his strawberries.

Expand full comment
mzf's avatar

Or the steel balls.

Expand full comment
marcus816's avatar

Rubbed them on their grundles and put them back in the freezer.

Expand full comment
BlueDot in Texas's avatar

I know! The headline about his unprofessional tantrum is sooo annoying!

Expand full comment
Trux Mint In Box's avatar

This is the only mention of it in the entire article and they don’t even show the quote. They make Musk sound like he is the victim

“Yes, there was the moment when, using profane language, Musk denounced companies that had suspended advertising on X following his endorsement of an antisemitic conspiracy theory. (He did try to clear the air, saying he hadn’t meant to support bigots. “I’m quite sorry” if he had encouraged them, he said.)

Expand full comment
BlueDot in Texas's avatar

Absolutely. It is quite something else when you listen to what was actually said.

Expand full comment
carovee's avatar

It wouldn't be NYT if they didn't weren't normalizing aggregious white male behavior.

Expand full comment
OG Blockhead's avatar

Looks like I picked the wrong day to quit sniffing glue

Expand full comment
Boaty the plural's avatar

On the one hand, we could be keeping the lights on. On the other hand, there are some mean tweets that we need congress to address.

Expand full comment
Dirty-Work's avatar

This is in no small part why I quit drinking. I'd be yelling at the stupid. Now I'm just massively annoyed.

Expand full comment
DJ Teetop's avatar

I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused

Expand full comment
Alpaca22's avatar

Now the angels want to wear my red shoes

Expand full comment
SkeptiKC's avatar

These motherfuckers sound like sovereign citizens, seriously.

They indignantly assert their rights are being violated, failing entirely to demonstrate any of the associated responsibilities those rights demand.

Expand full comment
Trump University Graduate's avatar

So Taibbi has gone full "skinhead" on us?

Expand full comment