SUP BRO? DRUDGE SIRENS AND DISCO BALLS AND CHER SINGING "DO YOU BELIEEEEEVE IN LIFE AFTER LOVE?!" There is a News Item in the News, about Matt Drudge, racist copy/paster for the Drudge Report, who says he is a heterosexual, which makes it so weird how Out Magazine always puts him on its annual list of the top 69 gays who 69 each other on the butt.
You can ride the baloney pony all you want, but don't pretend that it's good for society and tell the children it's ok (so to satisfy your perverted desires).
Spreading disease and abusing children is not an equal right. There's a reason why ever society in history that condoned homosexual activity has vanished.
We make no apologies for setting standards for a civilized society. If you want to spread disease in unnatural ways, have at it. But be prepared for the consequences of STDs.
Diseases are usually spread through ignorance fostered by powerful institutions such as churches. There is no evidence at all that homosexuals are more likely to abuse children than, say, christians. And finally, your argument does not address the hypocrisy of Drudge.
I was referring to liberals (I am a liberal) when I said we only shed light on hypocrites, some of which happen to be gay. I wasn't talking about Catholic priests (are you?)
A) You are just butt hurt that Matt is a homo. B) Please inform the audience about the day you made the conscious choice to be hetero, if that is your real orientation.
I didn't have to make a conscience decision to be hetero, it was innate from day one (and before). So, tell us of the day you decided you were so lonely, having been rejected by girl after girl, that you decided committing un-natural acts at the risk of obtaining and spreading disease was your life's destiny.
You can do it but at your own risk. The problem is, as history has shown, it's not good for society. No such institution that has permitted/condoned homosexual activity has lasted. Why? Because it spreads disease, perverts children's minds (the largest group of pedophiles, by far, are homosexual males- something like 29 times larger than the next closest group) and doesn't promote the continuance of a society (try knocking up your boyfriend).
Hypocrites such as those that want to financially ruin those that support God's word? See 'pizza store owners, bakery owners and county clerks'.... Check and mate.
None of your arguments hold water. There are no diseases that are limited to homosexuals; homosexuality does not spread diseases. There is no evidence at all that societies crumble because they are tolerant to homosexuals. Homosexuals do not pervert children.
All of your reasons show a great fear of homosexuals and, often, this fear is a fear of oneself.
The fact that you would think I am gay simply because I called you out as a colossal ignoramus on the subject of sexual orientation says all anybody needs to know about you and your intense sexual insecurity.
Why would you care if he's gay? How is it anyone's business? Plenty of gay conservative folks out there, you know.
You can ride the baloney pony all you want, but don't pretend that it's good for society and tell the children it's ok (so to satisfy your perverted desires).
Spreading disease and abusing children is not an equal right. There's a reason why ever society in history that condoned homosexual activity has vanished.
We make no apologies for setting standards for a civilized society. If you want to spread disease in unnatural ways, have at it. But be prepared for the consequences of STDs.
Wrote the man who calls himself 'JAWS'.
He's not an author, numbnutz. He's a writer. A writer composes articles and other short pieces. An author creates books.
Diseases are usually spread through ignorance fostered by powerful institutions such as churches. There is no evidence at all that homosexuals are more likely to abuse children than, say, christians. And finally, your argument does not address the hypocrisy of Drudge.
These rights are inalienable, you see, they even apply to narrow-minded people such as yourself.
I was referring to liberals (I am a liberal) when I said we only shed light on hypocrites, some of which happen to be gay. I wasn't talking about Catholic priests (are you?)
A) You are just butt hurt that Matt is a homo. B) Please inform the audience about the day you made the conscious choice to be hetero, if that is your real orientation.
I didn't have to make a conscience decision to be hetero, it was innate from day one (and before). So, tell us of the day you decided you were so lonely, having been rejected by girl after girl, that you decided committing un-natural acts at the risk of obtaining and spreading disease was your life's destiny.
You can do it but at your own risk. The problem is, as history has shown, it's not good for society. No such institution that has permitted/condoned homosexual activity has lasted. Why? Because it spreads disease, perverts children's minds (the largest group of pedophiles, by far, are homosexual males- something like 29 times larger than the next closest group) and doesn't promote the continuance of a society (try knocking up your boyfriend).
Hypocrites such as those that want to financially ruin those that support God's word? See 'pizza store owners, bakery owners and county clerks'.... Check and mate.
None of your arguments hold water. There are no diseases that are limited to homosexuals; homosexuality does not spread diseases. There is no evidence at all that societies crumble because they are tolerant to homosexuals. Homosexuals do not pervert children.
All of your reasons show a great fear of homosexuals and, often, this fear is a fear of oneself.
Which god? So many have been invented over the years that it's hard to figure out which one is still a thing.
The fact that you would think I am gay simply because I called you out as a colossal ignoramus on the subject of sexual orientation says all anybody needs to know about you and your intense sexual insecurity.