Looky here Jimmy Smitty, you better stop with the reckless eyeballing or I'm gonna have to lay the smack down. Wait, wasn't he the incoming president on the west wing? Did he resign and have Jeb Bartlett appoint him to the supreme court instead? What do you mean by the term 'make believe' I don't understand...
I can't understand why the Tea Party would be backing Christine O'Donnell. I wouldn't think using tax-payer money to lecture people on their private sexual conduct would fit into their definition of the proper role of the U.S. government.
I can't think of anything snarky to say about it. I'm simply that out of touch with conservative logic that the endorsement is beyond my capacity to rationalize.
<i>Senate Republicans are rolling out a plan to permanently extend an array of expiring tax breaks that would deprive the Treasury of more than $4 trillion over the next decade, nearly doubling projected deficits over that period unless dramatic spending cuts are made. </i>
If you can&#039;t kill it, starve it to death.
I&#039;m gone for the night. I just spilled my glass of expensive Dogfish Head Burton Baton on a batch of lottery tickets I haven&#039;t checked AND 2 unemployment search log worksheets I haven&#039;t filled out.
Oh Dog! That is so sad. Maybe you could suck the Dogfish out of the tickets. I&#039;m sure that doesn&#039;t sound right to the person who hasn&#039;t had a Dogfish ale.
Looky here Jimmy Smitty, you better stop with the reckless eyeballing or I&#039;m gonna have to lay the smack down. Wait, wasn&#039;t he the incoming president on the west wing? Did he resign and have Jeb Bartlett appoint him to the supreme court instead? What do you mean by the term &#039;make believe&#039; I don&#039;t understand...
Who the fuck is &quot;George&quot;? The guy with the spittle on him.
He better hope it&#039;s spittle, anyway.
The Tea Party needs to realize it really isn&#039;t the GOP and is an actual third-party and run that way.
Heh, heh, heh.
I can&#039;t understand why the Tea Party would be backing Christine O&#039;Donnell. I wouldn&#039;t think using tax-payer money to lecture people on their private sexual conduct would fit into their definition of the proper role of the U.S. government.
I can&#039;t think of anything snarky to say about it. I&#039;m simply that out of touch with conservative logic that the endorsement is beyond my capacity to rationalize.
The exception to &#039;less government&#039; is when it comes to puritan morality. And, of course, the coloreds/foreigns.
I have a feeling that will happen in 2012 when they decide the Republican nominee (anyone not named Sarah Palin) isn&#039;t good enough.
nYTimes reports on the GOP&#039;s latest:
<i>Senate Republicans are rolling out a plan to permanently extend an array of expiring tax breaks that would deprive the Treasury of more than $4 trillion over the next decade, nearly doubling projected deficits over that period unless dramatic spending cuts are made. </i>
If you can&#039;t kill it, starve it to death.
Yes. Do you need any help?
I&#039;m gone for the night. I just spilled my glass of expensive Dogfish Head Burton Baton on a batch of lottery tickets I haven&#039;t checked AND 2 unemployment search log worksheets I haven&#039;t filled out.
Deficit chickenhawks.
Oh Dog! That is so sad. Maybe you could suck the Dogfish out of the tickets. I&#039;m sure that doesn&#039;t sound right to the person who hasn&#039;t had a Dogfish ale.
Just when you think it can&#039;t get any worse... <a href="http://freedomist.com/2010/..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://freedomist.com/2010/09/09/andy-griffith-lo...">http://freedomist.com/2010/...
almost-last?
really?
almost-last?