8 Comments
User's avatar
chascates's avatar

That conversation was over 25 years ago, when Texas still care somewhat for those less fortunate than rich Republicans.

Dashboard Buddha's avatar

Well, he's got the crazy eyes, so that's a start.

PubOption's avatar

But only in the best of all possible states?

chascates's avatar

One of my friends who owns a small business was delighted when Tech Lady was running for governor of California last time. "Business people can run government way better than politicians." My reply that governments are not in any way like businesses failed to sway him. The administration of Dubya should have removed this idea from the collective consciousness but there's still the faint glimmer of hope that the right business <strike>pirate</strike> leader can fix mismanagement and overspending even where it doesn't exist. Another friend kept saying Texas should 'cut services'. When I asked what 'services' he just stammered and repeated 'cut services'. Talking points don't require much reality.

PubOption's avatar

I think she's flying back to California, on the (glowing) red-eye.

malsperanza's avatar

The problem with these megawealthy banksters is that they are too ambitious. Kashkari should really consider buying a smaller state first--say, Wyoming or New Hampshire or Arkansas.

Unless you're the Terminegger you can't usually leapfrog straight to buying a state with a bigger population than Canada. Bootstraps, Neel: bootstraps!

schmannity's avatar

Since California just turned a $7 billion dollar budget surplus, I smell a vulture capitalist "harvesting." Maybe Bain Capital can underwrite a part of his campaign.