15 Comments

<blockquote>She also said that when she told the committee about the case, they thought it actually made her a better candidate, since she had everyday life experiences that voters could identify with ...</blockquote> And isn't this just the essence of GOP eligibility screening after all?

Expand full comment

But big gains in the Republican Party's ability to attract insanity, so the numbers tie out I guess?

Expand full comment

Confess, Dok, you chose that brand of "whiskey" just for VecchioJohn.

Expand full comment

Drunk with power. And booze.

Expand full comment

Say, do you know which other female Republican candidate for high office was not particularly well-vetted before being nominated by the GOP and it got a tad embarrassing?

Expand full comment

Mister Poleezman.

Expand full comment

It'd be (a) fine.

Expand full comment

Well, truly, drunk lawyers dancing anywhere.

Expand full comment

If she had <i>passed</i> that bar, there would be no problem. But, no, she had to go inside.

Expand full comment

<i>why am I being asked to go to a trial where they cannot prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt?</i>

Ummm... maybe because the purpose of a trial is to establish whether there's reasonable doubt?

Just spitballing here.

Expand full comment

She was trying to market her new perfume <i>Downwind of a Distillery</i>.

Expand full comment

"But Officer, I thought Minnesota was an open-carry state!"

Expand full comment

Christ I'd still be married to W2 if that were the way it worked.

Expand full comment

A Google image search for Michelle MacDonald produces surprising, if not terrifying-in-an-unexpected-way, results. <a href="https://www.google.it/searc..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="https://www.google.it/search?q=michelle+macdonald...">https://www.google.it/searc...

Expand full comment

Framed, I was framed I never do nothin' wrong, but I always get blamed, framed

Expand full comment