67 Comments

It's not the 'haves and the have-nots' anymore; it's the 'haves, used to haves, and the will never haves'.

Expand full comment

THAT is a great movie!

Expand full comment

My money's on the Duke of Buckingham.

Expand full comment

I like the quote from the Virginia woman. Yes, it IS looking that bad for Mitt.

Expand full comment

I hope you don't think I was referring to you.

Expand full comment

Z, I'm sure the Money Badger has a pretty good idea of what the median income is. Someone has told him that, repeatedly. When he says shit like "the top end of middle-income is $200K or $250K" he is employing the venerable rhetorical technique known as "lying".

I do not think he is stupid. I also don't think he is anywhere near as smart as he thinks he is (the born-on-third-base syndrome is strong in this one). I also too, further, additionally, think that he is borderline sociopathic, but his upper-class-bubble life has prevented him from developing the charming persona that distinguishes truly successful sociopaths.

Expand full comment

Look, at least Wagner died before he could license his tunes for commercials.

Expand full comment

Wait, there are fucking stamps? Where do I sign up?

Expand full comment

Actually, I'd quite like to have a chat with Bill Ayers.

Expand full comment

<i>This comment makes over $300,000 and says to go fuck yourself, I'm good </i>

Expand full comment

<a href="http:\/\/i1115.photobucket.com\/albums\/k551\/denniverse\/stayclassymitt.jpg" target="_blank">This.</a>

Expand full comment

I dunno, but they have the look of future pedophiles and porn hounds written all over them.

Expand full comment

Apropos of Nothing, Gretchen Carlson still got them CRAZY eyes.

Expand full comment

Yes, <a href="vhttp:\/\/art-bin.com\/art\/omodest.html" target="_blank">it has.</a>

Expand full comment

And of course, the short takeaway here is when you kick over an anthill, don't be surprised when the little fuckers swarm up your leg and start biting the fuck out of you.

Expand full comment

Yes, this statement really begs the question: how does Mitt define the "very poor"? People who earn a mere $100k?

Expand full comment