Discussion about this post

User's avatar
3FingerPete's avatar

That they received only 6 anti- letters seems like a tidbit a competent newspaper would publish.

Expand full comment
pmsrw3's avatar

On 13-July-1920 the New York Times said in an editorial that Robert Goddard was wrong to believe that rockets could function in the vacuum of space, and added:

That Professor Goddard with his 'chair' in Clark College and the countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution, does not know the relation of action to reaction, and of the need to something better than a vacuum against which to react—to say that would be absurd. Of course he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools."

On 17-July-1969, the day after Apollo 11 landed on the moon, the Times published the following retraction:

Further investigation and experimentation have confirmed the findings of Isaac Newton in the 17th Century and it is now definitely established a rocket can function in a vacuum as well as in an atmosphere. The Times regrets the error.

What I have always found funny about this is that the Times' estimate of "the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools" was probably completely accurate.

Expand full comment
248 more comments...

No posts